cover
Hardware 8.5

PELADN WO4 Ryzen 5 5600H Mini-PC Review – Compact, Balanced Performance & Budget-Friendly

Muhammad Zuhair

Mini-PCs have become significantly more mainstream compared to where they were a few years ago, driven by advancements in the APU segment from companies like AMD and Intel. We have reviewed several devices on the website, featuring vendors like ACEMAGIC, GMKtec, and others, but today, we have our hands on a newer manufacturer, PELADN. PELADN has been a dominant vendor in the Chinese market, featuring a broad portfolio that includes custom GPUs, mini-PCs, docking stations, and more. However, today, we are reviewing their budget-friendly WO4 mini-PC, which appears to be a solid offering.

PELADN WO4 Ryzen 5 5600H Mini-PC: A Quick Rundown of Specifications & Unboxing Experience

The WO4 mini-PC is touted as a low-to-mid-range option for gamers seeking a compact machine. On paper, the specifications indicate that across multiple workloads, including gaming, media consumption, and professional tasks, you would achieve subpar performance, yet still suitable for getting the job done. Here is a quick rundown of the specifications of the PELADN WO4 mini-PC:

Related Story BOSGAME M4 ‘Ryzen 7 8745HS’ Mini PC Review – Strong Performance & OCuLink + USB4 at a Budget-Friendly Price
CategorySpecification
APU (CPU)AMD Ryzen 5 5600H – 6 Cores / 12 Threads, 3.3 GHz base, up to 4.2 GHz boost
GPUIntegrated AMD Radeon Graphics (Vega-based iGPU)
RAM/SSD16 GB DDR4-3200, 512 GB storage
Video Output Ports1× HDMI 2.0 (4K @ 60 Hz), 1× DisplayPort 1.4 (4K @ 60 Hz), 1× USB-C (Video + Data)
USB Ports2× USB 3.2, 2× USB 3.0
Ethernet / LAN1× 2.5 GbE RJ45, 1× 1 GbE RJ45
Other Ports1× 3.5 mm audio jack, 1× DC power input

The above specifications indicate that the WO4 is a solid, all-around option, making it the optimal choice for modern-day usage. We'll dive more into performance ahead, but in terms of the unboxing experience, well, the PELADN WO4 surely features impressive packaging. Out of the box, you receive the standard mini-PC, along with a 19V power adapter, manual instructions, and a wall mount bracket. Considering the pricing of this model, the packaging wasn't lacking in any area, which made this observation particularly interesting.

In terms of the WO4 itself, the build quality isn't the best, as it features an aluminium frame with a plastic housing at the front, which gives the mini-PC an unusual appearance. However, it certainly gets the job done. The device features airflow cutouts on both sides and the bottom, which should be ample, considering that the 5600H is already a power-efficient platform. However, the most interesting part of the WO4 mini-PC is yet to come.

This is one of the first devices I have reviewed that features a detachable magnetic top, and the intention behind it is to make upgrades and repairs easier. Upon opening it, you gain access to the PCIe slot, as well as RAM channels, making it easier for an average consumer to upgrade their device's specifications. For me, this was a great surprise from PELADN, considering that in the past, I had faced a lot of trouble opening up mini-PCs, as some of them are really difficult to access.

The overall look of the WO4 does resemble the 'traditional' office look, with no RGB elements apart from a standard blue light on the power button, but this isn't a downside of a device; it's just my personal preference. We'll take a look at performance next, which is the more interesting element of this review.

PELADN WO4 Ryzen 5 5600H Mini-PC: Synthetic & Gaming Benchmarks

We'll start with synthetic benchmarks, covering software like Geekbench, Cinebench, and CPU-Z, to analyze how the mini-PC performs in traditional workloads.

[/chart]

Geekbench 5 (Higher is Better)
Single-Core
Multi-Core
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
PELADN WO4 (AMD Ryzen 5 5600H)
1.5k
7.1k
Minisforum UM690 (AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX)
1.7k
10k
Minisforum HM90 (AMD Ryzen 9 4900H)
1.6k
6.9k
Minisforum UM560XT (AMD Ryzen 5 5600H)
1.6k
6.7k
Minisforum TH50 (Intel Core i5-11320H)
1.2k
5.3k
Intel NUC11PHKi7C  (Core i7-1165G7)
1.5k
4.5k
Intel NUC8i7HVKVA (Core i7-8809G)
1.5k
4.4k
CPU-Z (Higher is Better)
Single-Core
Multi-Core
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
PELADN WO4 (AMD Ryzen 5 5600H)
582
4k
Minisforum UM690 (AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX)
767
6.9k
Minisforum HM90 (AMD Ryzen 9 4900H)
523
5.3k
Minisforum TH50 (Intel Core i5-11320H)
602
3k
Intel NUC11PHKi7C  (Core i7-1165G7)
585
2.8k
Intel NUC8i7HVKVA (Core i7-8809G)
432
2.2k
Cinebench R20 (Higher is Better)
Single-Core
Multi-Core
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
PELADN WO4 (AMD Ryzen 5 5600H)
533
3.4k
Minisforum UM690 (AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX)
599
5.7k
Minisforum HM90 (AMD Ryzen 9 4900H)
504
4.4k
Minisforum UM560XT (AMD Ryzen 5 5600H)
560
4.2k
Minisforum TH50 (Intel Core i5-11320H)
558
2.6k
Intel NUC11PHKi7C  (Core i7-1165G7)
549
2k
Intel NUC8i7HVKVA (Core i7-8809G)
429
2.6k

PEALADN WO4 - Gaming Performance

Gaming Benchmarks (1080P FPS)
PELADN WO4 (AMD RX Vega 7)
Minisforum Venus (AMD 680M RDNA 2)
Minisforum Venus (AMD Vega 7)
Minisforum DeskMini (AMD Vega 8)
Minisforum EliteMini (Iris Xe-LP)
Intel Phantom Canyon (Iris Xe-LP)
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
Civilization VI (Medium)
77
101
80
76
50
48
CSGO (Medium)
121
158
117
110
80
79
Fortnite (Low)
75
98
70
66
40
39
Forza Horizon 5 (Low)
81
140
80
72
60
58
Dota 2 (Highest)
99
120
92
88
65
62

Synthetic and gaming benchmarks clearly indicate that the PELDAN W04, despite being based on an architecture several years old, manages to hold up reasonably well against its counterparts. Across AAA titles, it provides sub-par performance. Of course, with the Vega 7 iGPU, you cannot expect high-end gaming performance, but for a minimal experience, the 5600H does stack up pretty well. More importantly, across these benchmarks, the mini-PC temperatures were maintained within the 70- to 80-degree range, which means that the thermal design of the PELADN WO4 is effective.

Conclusion: PELADN WO4 Ryzen 5 5600H Mini-PC

The Cezanne APU platform has been a great success of its time, as it brought a significant boost in capabilities to a mobile platform. However, when you factor in today's performance requirements, the 5600H can only do the job with subpar quality. The PELADN WO4 is a great option if you are looking for a portable device that allows for easy upgradability and has sufficient performance for light workloads. However, if you intend to use it for more demanding tasks, the WO4 may not be the best choice.

The PELADN WO4 mini-PC is available for $349.99 with a 32GB/1TB configuration, while the 16GB/512GB option retails for $299.00. This is decent pricing for this particular device, considering the performance and product quality you are getting onboard.

You can find additional information about our hardware review process and ethics policy here.

8.5
WCCFTECH RATING

The PELADN W04 is a solid, budget-friendly mini-PC, that features decent gaming performance along with an efficient upgrading mechanism, but it does lag behind when you intend hardcore gaming performance.

    Pros
  • Great Build Quality
  • Impressive Upgrading Mechanism
  • Decent Gaming/Synthetic Performance
    Cons
  • Slightly Pricey
Buy for $339.99 from Amazon The links above are affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate, Wccftech.com may earn from qualifying purchases.
Muhammad Zuhair Photo

About the author: Muhammad Zuhair is a hardware and technology reporter for Wccftech, specializing in the semiconductor industry and the complex interplay between technology, manufacturing, and geopolitics. His coverage focuses on the corporate strategies and technological roadmaps of industry giants like TSMC, NVIDIA, Samsung, and Intel. Zuhair's expertise lies in deconstructing complex topics such as fabrication nodes (e.g., 2nm process), the economic impact of policies like the CHIPS Act, and the strategic development of AI infrastructure from NVIDIA, AMD and Intel.

Follow Wccftech on Google to get more of our news coverage in your feeds.

Button