Intel Xeon 696X 64-Core Granite Rapids-WS CPU Benchmark Leaks, 27% Slower Vs 64-Core Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX

Hassan Mujtaba
A close-up of an Intel Xeon 696X processor with the label 'intel xeon 696X' in the background.

Intel's Xeon 696X CPU, featuring 64 cores, has leaked out in the latest benchmarks, but trails behind AMD's Threadripper offerings.

Intel Xeon 696X "Granite Rapids-WS" CPU Boasts 64-Cores With An Impressive 336 MB of L3 Cache, But Falls Behind The 64-Core Threadripper In PassMark Benchmark

Intel's Xeon 696X CPU, one of the high-end chips in the Granite Rapids-WS (Workstation) lineup, leaked out a couple of weeks ago. This was the first time that we got a glance at the specifications & also the preliminary performance results.

Related Story LG Japan Drops Pre-Order Pricing For Its 5K2K UltraGear OLED, Slashing 21% Off The $2,099 Flagship Before Launch

Now, the same chip has leaked out in the PassMark Software database, where it is shown as a 32-core SKU, though we know that this is just an erroneous reporting by the software itself. The Intel Xeon 696X packs a total of 64 cores and 128 threads based on the Redwood Cove P-Core architecture. It carries an impressive 336 MB of L3 and 128 MB of L2 cache, and the clock speeds are rated at 2.4 GHz base with boost speeds around the 4.6 GHz mark.

These specifications already outpace the current flagship "Sapphire Rapids-WS" chip, the Xeon W9-3595X CPU, which offers 60 cores and 120 threads. The Granite Rapids-WS lineup features TDPs of 350W at base and should be around 450-500W at MTP. The previous-gen had a maximum turbo power of up to 462W.

In terms of performance, the Intel Xeon 696X CPU scored 3359 points in the single-core and 112,888 points in the multi-core test. This is 27% behind the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9985WX, which also packs 64 cores but is based on the Zen 5 architecture.

PassMark CPU Benchmark (Higher is Better)
ST
MT
0
25727
51454
77181
102908
128635
154362
0
25727
51454
77181
102908
128635
154362
Threadripper Pro 9985WX (64-Core)
4512
154361
Xeon 696X (64-Core)
3359
112888
Xeon W9-3595X (60-Core)
3714
96443

At the same time, the CPU offers a 17% boost versus the Xeon W9-3595X, but one thing that leads us to believe that these numbers are based on early ES samples is that the single-threaded score for the Xeon 696X is worse than that of the Xeon W9-3595X. So we can expect better performance figures once the final retail or qualification samples start to show up.

Intel is expected to unveil the next-generation workstation lineup next year, and we could probably see that happening at CES 2026, so stay tuned.

Intel Granite Rapids "Xeon Workstation" CPU Family (Official):

CPU NameCores / ThreadsClock (Base / Boost)L3 CacheMemoryPCIe LanesTDPPrice
Xeon 698X86 / 1722.0 / 4.8 GHz336 MB8Ch 6400/8000128 Gen5350W$7699
Xeon 696X64 / 1282.4 / 4.8 GHz336 MB8Ch 6400/8000128 Gen5350W$5599
Xeon 678XTBD2.4 / 4.9 GHz192 MB8Ch 6400/8000128 Gen5300W$3749
Xeon 676XTBD2.8 / 4.9 GHz144 MB8Ch 6400/8000128 Gen5275W$2499
Xeon 674XTBD3.0 / 4.9 GHz144 MB8Ch 6400/8000128 Gen5270W$2199
Xeon 658XTBD3.0 / 4.9 GHz144 MB8Ch 6400/8000128 Gen5250W$1699
Xeon 656TBD2.8 / 4.8 GHz72 MB8Ch 6400/8000128 Gen5210W$1399
Xeon 65418 / 363.1 / 4.8 GHz72 MB8Ch 6400/8000128 Gen5200W$1199
Xeon 638TBD3.2 / 4.8 GHz72 MB4Ch 640080 Gen5180W$899
Xeon 636TBD3.5 / 4.7 GHz48 MB4Ch 640080 Gen5170W$639
Xeon 634TBD2.7 / 4.6 GHz48 MB4Ch 640080 Gen5150W$499

News Source: @x86deadandback

Hassan Mujtaba Photo

About the author: A Software Engineer by training and a PC enthusiast by passion, Hassan Mujtaba serves as Wccftech's Senior Editor for hardware section. With years of experience in the industry, he specializes in deep-dive technical analysis of next-generation CPU and GPU architectures, motherboards, and cooling solutions. His work involves not only breaking news on upcoming technologies but also extensive hands-on reviews and benchmarking.

Follow Wccftech on Google to get more of our news coverage in your feeds.

Button