Former CEO Craig Barrett Claims That Only Intel Can Save the US Chip Industry, Not TSMC; Advises the Administration to Force Big Tech to Invest in the Company’s Chip Capacity

Muhammad Zuhair
Intel US
Image Credits: Intel

Intel's former CEO Craig Barrett has taken a rather 'aggressive' stance toward the recent rumors and reports about Team Blue, saying that the firm needs to step up.

Intel's ex-CEO Claims That TSMC & Others Aren't Ready to Shift Cutting-Edge Nodes to the US

Well, Intel's situation right now is pivotal, given that the firm is experiencing not only economic uncertainty but also a political debate. Team Blue's CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, is claimed to have a conflicted personality, and more importantly, the future of the foundry division is quite complicated as well. However, Intel's former CEO Craig Barrett gave his opinions on the situation in an op-ed on Fortune, claiming that the US has no option other than Team Blue for its chip manufacturing needs.

Related Story Intel Foundry’s Rio Rancho Facility To Become Its Crown Jewel In Production of Next-Gen Glass Substrates

He claims that the "USA NEEDS INTEL," and neither Samsung nor TSMC is ready to bring state-of-the-art manufacturing to America. Moreover, Barrett also says that Big Tech needs a 'reliable' second substitute to the likes of TSMC, and for them, Intel is the only option. Well, Barrett certainly has some interesting claims, but when it comes to cutting-edge technology, both TSMC and Samsung are ready to bring 2nm processes into the US, and both of them are also prepping respective production lines.

He acknowledges that Intel is in desperate need of financing. In order to meet the needs of TSMC in terms of production capacity, they need at least a figure of 40 billion dollars, which is higher than the CHIPS Act grants. However, instead of the government aiding the US chipmaker, the administration needs to develop a plan for firms like NVIDIA and Apple investing in Intel's cutting-edge processes, which will help smooth things up for the company.

Barrett also criticized Intel's potential decision to abandon the race for cutting-edge nodes, claiming that you need to be a leader, not a follower. His views are interesting, but they don't consider geopolitical factors and the increased investments from the likes of TSMC and Samsung, to the point where they are ready for a technology transfer.

Intel is significant right now only because of its legacy as a US chipmaker, but when it comes to actual end products, few things give the firm importance. It would be interesting to see how the situation pans out for Team Blue, especially after the meeting of CEO Lip-Bu Tan and President Trump, which is expected to smooth things up.

Muhammad Zuhair Photo

About the author: Muhammad Zuhair is a hardware and technology reporter for Wccftech, specializing in the semiconductor industry and the complex interplay between technology, manufacturing, and geopolitics. His coverage focuses on the corporate strategies and technological roadmaps of industry giants like TSMC, NVIDIA, Samsung, and Intel. Zuhair's expertise lies in deconstructing complex topics such as fabrication nodes (e.g., 2nm process), the economic impact of policies like the CHIPS Act, and the strategic development of AI infrastructure from NVIDIA, AMD and Intel.

Follow Wccftech on Google to get more of our news coverage in your feeds.

Button