[Update] Zuckerberg Is Finally Out with His “Explanation” of the Cambridge Analytica Scandal

Author Photo
Mar 21, 2018
21Shares
Submit

[Update] Zuckerberg says he is really sorry.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has finally broken silence on Cambridge Analytica’s data use, the incident that many believe threatens to rock the company. While the news first broke over the weekend, the company’s executives have remained silent like they have over several other similar incidents in the past.

But as the “#DeleteFacebook” campaign continues to gain momentum over on Twitter with people being vocal against the social networking giant’s continued disregard for user privacy and choice, it appears the executives are finally ready to explain – and justify – the Cambridge Analytica incident and why Facebook decided to stay silent for over two years.

facebook-24Related Facebook Beats Revenue Estimates Amid Data Privacy Scandal – EPS of $1.69 & 48 MAU Added

“We have a responsibility to protect your data, and if we can’t then we don’t deserve to serve you” – Facebook CEO, Mark Zuckerberg

In a Facebook post today, Zuckerberg repeated what a Facebook spokesperson has been telling the media: the issue can’t happen now because the company changed the rules years ago. While Zuck has completely ignored to respond to concerns over why the company never disclosed this incident to affected people whose data was taken without their informed consent, he does promise that in the future, Facebook will inform people “affected by” apps that “misused personally identifiable information.”

He has promised to cooperate with the investigators, but the Facebook CEO has also avoided explaining why the company tried to threaten reporters into silence before the story was broken and the issue went completely out of control. Lawmakers in the United States and Europe are currently looking into concerns over misuse of data and Facebook’s silence on the matter.

Here’s the complete statement (emphasis is ours) that does close to nothing to explain why the company didn’t alert affected users and is yet another reminder that Facebook has completely lost empathy for its userbase. However, it does come with at least a few good steps, especially the promise that Facebook will limit the data it shares with apps you sign in using Facebook.

facebook-gdprRelated Facebook Tries to Share Details of What Exactly Advertisers Know About You

I want to share an update on the Cambridge Analytica situation — including the steps we’ve already taken and our next steps to address this important issue.

We have a responsibility to protect your data, and if we can’t then we don’t deserve to serve you. I’ve been working to understand exactly what happened and how to make sure this doesn’t happen again. The good news is that the most important actions to prevent this from happening again today we have already taken years ago. But we also made mistakes, there’s more to do, and we need to step up and do it.

Here’s a timeline of the events:

In 2007, we launched the Facebook Platform with the vision that more apps should be social. Your calendar should be able to show your friends’ birthdays, your maps should show where your friends live, and your address book should show their pictures. To do this, we enabled people to log into apps and share who their friends were and some information about them.

In 2013, a Cambridge University researcher named Aleksandr Kogan created a personality quiz app. It was installed by around 300,000 people who shared their data as well as some of their friends’ data. Given the way our platform worked at the time this meant Kogan was able to access tens of millions of their friends’ data.

In 2014, to prevent abusive apps, we announced that we were changing the entire platform to dramatically limit the data apps could access. Most importantly, apps like Kogan’s could no longer ask for data about a person’s friends unless their friends had also authorized the app. We also required developers to get approval from us before they could request any sensitive data from people. These actions would prevent any app like Kogan’s from being able to access so much data today.

In 2015, we learned from journalists at The Guardian that Kogan had shared data from his app with Cambridge Analytica. It is against our policies for developers to share data without people’s consent, so we immediately banned Kogan’s app from our platform, and demanded that Kogan and Cambridge Analytica formally certify that they had deleted all improperly acquired data. They provided these certifications.

Last week, we learned from The Guardian, The New York Times and Channel 4 that Cambridge Analytica may not have deleted the data as they had certified. We immediately banned them from using any of our services. Cambridge Analytica claims they have already deleted the data and has agreed to a forensic audit by a firm we hired to confirm this. We’re also working with regulators as they investigate what happened.

This was a breach of trust between Kogan, Cambridge Analytica and Facebook. But it was also a breach of trust between Facebook and the people who share their data with us and expect us to protect it. We need to fix that.

In this case, we already took the most important steps a few years ago in 2014 to prevent bad actors from accessing people’s information in this way. But there’s more we need to do and I’ll outline those steps here:

First, we will investigate all apps that had access to large amounts of information before we changed our platform to dramatically reduce data access in 2014, and we will conduct a full audit of any app with suspicious activity. We will ban any developer from our platform that does not agree to a thorough audit. And if we find developers that misused personally identifiable information, we will ban them and tell everyone affected by those apps. That includes people whose data Kogan misused here as well.

Second, we will restrict developers’ data access even further to prevent other kinds of abuse. For example, we will remove developers’ access to your data if you haven’t used their app in 3 months. We will reduce the data you give an app when you sign in — to only your name, profile photo, and email address. We’ll require developers to not only get approval but also sign a contract in order to ask anyone for access to their posts or other private data. And we’ll have more changes to share in the next few days.

Third, we want to make sure you understand which apps you’ve allowed to access your data. In the next month, we will show everyone a tool at the top of your News Feed with the apps you’ve used and an easy way to revoke those apps’ permissions to your data. We already have a tool to do this in your privacy settings, and now we will put this tool at the top of your News Feed to make sure everyone sees it.

Beyond the steps we had already taken in 2014, I believe these are the next steps we must take to continue to secure our platform.

I started Facebook, and at the end of the day I’m responsible for what happens on our platform. I’m serious about doing what it takes to protect our community. While this specific issue involving Cambridge Analytica should no longer happen with new apps today, that doesn’t change what happened in the past. We will learn from this experience to secure our platform further and make our community safer for everyone going forward.

I want to thank all of you who continue to believe in our mission and work to build this community together. I know it takes longer to fix all these issues than we’d like, but I promise you we’ll work through this and build a better service over the long term.

[Update]: Zuckerberg’s “sorry” finally comes

After his post on Facebook, many criticized the Facebook CEO for stopping short of a clear apology despite some calling this the worst scandal Facebook has had to handle in its history. Zuckerberg finally apologized during an interview to CNN.

“This was a major breach of trust, and I’m really sorry that this happened. We have a basic responsibility to protect peoples’ data.”

Zuckerberg also said that he is “happy” to testify before Congress if he is the person with the “most knowledge” at Facebook.

– Earlier: 50 Million FB Profiles Harvested Without User Consent – Data Monster Chose NOT to Alert Victims & Is Trying to Threaten Reporters

Submit