cover
Hardware

OneXPlayer X1 Pro 3-in-1 “AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370” Gaming Handheld – Premium Handheld Experience

Hassan Mujtaba

PC gaming handhelds have become a vibrant segment that is seeing continued innovations thanks to modern-day CPUs' ability to deliver outstanding performance and efficiency. All major hardware manufacturers are into the handheld craze. Compared to the first iteration of handhelds, these newest devices offer a lot of gaming performance backed up by unique designs and shapes/sizes that cater to all kinds of gamers.

The PC gaming handhelds are slowly replacing typical laptops in the sub 14" segment. They are perfect for users who want mobility gaming close to them and also have the full PC experience.

Related Story OneXPlayer Announces $200 Price Hike For OneXFly APEX Gaming Handheld

One such manufacturer of these gaming handhelds is OneXPlayer who have a solid array of PC handheld game consoles in its portfolio. The company offers both, full-on handhelds, mini netbooks & multi-purpose devices. With the launch of AMD's Ryzen AI 300 lineup, the company has updated one of its most powerful handheld devices with newer hardware and various upgrades.

So today, we are going to look at the OneXPlayer X1 Pro portable game console with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 APU and see how it performs in a handheld environment.

OneXPlayer X1 Pro Gaming Handheld - Specifications At A Glance

In terms of specifications, the OneXPlayer X1 Pro is equipped with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 APU. This is the flagship processor within the Strix mobile lineup and has a lot to talk about so let's get started.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 APU features 12 cores in total with 24 threads. The cores are a mix of 4 Zen 5 and 8 Zen 5C cores which allow AMD to maximize the efficiency of its mobile lineup. The CPU has a base frequency of 2.0 GHz. The Zen 5 cores clock up to 5.1 GHz while the Zen 5C cores clock in at 3.3 GHz at max boost. The chip features a total of 24 MB cache and has a TDP rating of 15-54 Watts though the handheld we tested today maxes out at 30W.

For the iGPU, AMD is using its latest RDNA 3.5 architecture which is a slightly upgraded & more efficient variant of the RDNA 3 architecture.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is configured with the Radeon 890M GPU which offers 16 compute units (1024 SPs) that clock up to 2.9 GHz and feature a maximum TOPS rating of up to 30. The Radeon 890M iGPU supports all the latest APIs and AI Frameworks. Plus, RDNA 3.5 also supports the latest upscaling and frame generation features such as FSR 2, FSR 3, FSR 3 Frame-Gen, and AFMF2 while adding advanced latency reduction technologies such as Anti-Lag 2. These are perfect for handhelds where every bit of performance matters.

 

On the NPU side, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is equipped with an XDNA 2 NPU which offers a peak TOPS of 50 and supports all the latest AI frameworks. This is the fastest NPU in terms of AI TOPS in the market right now and the only thing that comes close is the 48 TOPS of the Lunar Lake lineup.

AMD Ryzen AI 300 APUs:

CPU NameArchitectureCores / ThreadsClock Speeds (Max)Cache (Total)AI CapabilitiesiGPUTDP
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375Zen 5 / Zen 5C12/242.0 / 5.1 GHz36 MB / 24 MB L385 AI TOPs (55 TOPS NPU)Radeon 890M (16 CU @ 2.9 GHz)28W (cTDP 15-54W)
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375Zen 5 / Zen 5C12/242.0 / 5.1 GHz36 MB / 24 MB L3Radeon 890M (16 CU @ 2.9 GHz)28W (cTDP 15-54W)
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370Zen 5 / Zen 5C12/242.0 / 5.1 GHz36 MB / 24 MB L385 AI TOPs (55 TOPS NPU)Radeon 890M (16 CU @ 2.9 GHz)28W (cTDP 15-54W)
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370Zen 5 / Zen 5C12/242.0 / 5.1 GHz36 MB / 24 MB L380 AI TOPs (50 TOPS NPU)Radeon 890M (16 CU @ 2.9 GHz)28W (cTDP 15-54W)
Ryzen AI 7 365Zen 5 / Zen 5C10/202.0 / 5.0 GHz30 MB / 20 MB L380 AI TOPs (50 TOPS NPU)Radeon 880M (12 CU @ 2.9 GHz)28W (cTDP 15-54W)
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360Zen 5 / Zen 5C8/162.0 / 5.0 GHz24 MB / 16 MB L380 AI TOPs (50 TOPS NPU)Radeon 880M (12 CU @ TBD GHz)28W (cTDP 15-54W)

 

dsc_0471-custom-12
dsc_0472-custom-9
dsc_0473-custom-12
dsc_0474-custom-11

With the internals of the APU covered, let's talk about the rest of the specifications. First, we have the memory which comes in the form of 32 GB of LPDDR5X. These are 64-bit DRAM modules that are rated at 7500 MT/s speeds and this is soldered memory so you better keep in mind the configuration you are purchasing based on your demands. You can get up to 64 GB memory in two configurations though those will cost extra,

dsc_0476-custom-11
dsc_0477-custom-10
dsc_0489-custom-10
dsc_0493-custom-8
dsc_0494-custom-7

Storage includes a 1 TB ACER N7000 SSD which is rated at up to 7.2 GB/s speeds. The handheld is equipped with a single M.2 2280 SSD slot which can support up to 2 TB capacities. There's also a MicroSD card reader that supports the SD 4.0 protocol, up to 2 TB capacities, and up to 300 MB/s read speeds.

dsc_0496-custom-7
dsc_0497-custom-8
dsc_0498-custom-7
dsc_0493-custom-8
dsc_0494-custom-7
dsc_0495-custom-8

For display, you are getting a 10.95"LTPS screen with a maximum resolution of 2560x1600 and a maximum refresh rate of 120Hz configured on this gaming handheld. The screen delivers a max brightness of 540 nits and is 138% SRGB color space rated with a 16:10 aspect ratio. It also comes with a front-facing camera with 30fps@1080p capabilities. Audio is delivered through the Harman AudioEFX technology which includes a 12x27mm full-range speaker unit with a Stereo 2.0 design & 300Hz-14kHz frequency response.

dsc_0478-custom-10
dsc_0479-custom-10
dsc_0480-custom-8
dsc_0481-custom-11
dsc_0482-custom-10
dsc_0483-custom-10

IO includes a 1x SD Card Reader,  2 USB 4.0 Type-C ports, a USB 3.2 Type-A port, a 3.5mm audio jack, and an OCULINK connector. There are also three magnetic connections on the sides and bottom that are used to connect the detachable joysticks and keyboards. Wireless connectivity includes WIFI6E and Bluetooth 5.3 functionality. The handheld is equipped with a 65.02Whr which juices up the 1689mAh power cell while a Gallium Nitride Fast charger offers 100W quick charging for super fast charging.

dsc_0523-custom-9
dsc_0524-custom-8
dsc_0525-custom-8

We were shipped with a separate case containing the two joysticks that can easily be connected to the sides of the tablet for a true handheld experience. These are very nice joysticks with tactile feedback on the buttons while the analog sticks and triggers are perfectly placed and each joystick fits in the palm nicely with its thickened handle grip and curved design. The sticks also feature RGB LEDs which can also be seen on the back.

There's also a special "Turbo" mode button on the top which opens up the OneXPlayer OSD. This lets you tweak various settings such as the Performance profile that can tune the TDP between 4-30W, the fan Mode which you can set between Auto and two custom-set profiles, the vibration settings, and a range of other options.

OneXPlayer X1 Pro Gaming Handheld - CPU Performance

We start by comparing the 3DMark CPU Profile tests where the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 sits right below the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H though you are looking at twice the power input of that part as the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 here consumes only up to 30W power, making it a very strong result for the red team.

3DMark CPU Profile (Higher is Better)
Max Threads
16 Threads
8 Threads
4 Threads
2 Threads
1 Thread
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
8396
8478
6576
4236
2140
1061
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370)
6911
6412
5184
3590
2086
1129
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
6348
6149
5276
3664
2202
1157
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
5751
5736
5756
3708
2085
1139

In AIDA64's memory benchmark, we see that both the Ryzen AI 9 365 and the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 offer similar bandwidth figures though the latter offers much better latency figures.

AIDA64 Cache & Memory Benchmark "Memory* Cache MB/s" (Higher is Better)
Read
Write
Copy
Latency
0
19007
38014
57021
76028
95035
114042
0
19007
38014
57021
76028
95035
114042
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
90437
102002
82305
119.7
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
87465
114041
104473
99.9
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370)
86112
102710
80809
107.6
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
78486
75644
86896
137.6

For Blender, AMD's Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 offers 15% faster performance than the Ryzen AI 9 365 while closing in on the Ultra 9 285H in the monster test and leading in the rest of the two tests.

Blender "Samples Per Minute"  (Higher is Better)
monster
junkshop
classroom
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
106
65.6
42.4
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370)
103
75.9
50.9
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
90
65.9
44.2
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
63
39.4
28.2

In CPU-z, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is 12.2% faster than the 365 and offers similar single-core performance.

CPU-z 2.13.0 (Higher is Better)
Single-Core
Multi-Core
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
829.3
9336
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370)
795.9
7070
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
800.2
6300
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
741.4
4959

For Cinebench 2024, we are once again looking at a 15.5% uplift versus the 365 while the single-core performance almost matches that of the new Core Ultra 200H parts.

Cinebench 2024 (Higher is Better)
Single-Core
Multi-Core
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370)
116
961
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
123
928
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
113
832
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
119
591

In Geekbench 6, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 on the OneXPlayer X1 Pro trails the 365 due to its limited TDP while the single-core score sees a 3.2% uplift.

Geekbench 6 (Higher is Better)
Single-Core
Multi-Core
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
2949
16032
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370)
2913
12054
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
2820
12693
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
2616
10805

In UL Procyon's office test, we see both AMD Ryzen AI 300 APUs perform on par with one another.

UL Procyon Office Suite (Higher is Better)
Word
Excel
PowerPoint
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
8131
6706
6730
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
7807
6459
7699
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370)
6449
6184
6890
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
6198
6103
6448

Lastly, we have the Winrar benchmark test which sees the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 leading over the Ryzen AI 9 365 by 10%.

Winrar 7.01 (Higher is Better)
Speed (KB/s)
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370)
19247
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
17515
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
15911
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
8666

OneXPlayer X1 Pro Gaming Handheld - AI Synthetic Performance

Next up, we have our first AI benchmarks for the latest Intel and AMD CPUs. First up, we have the Geekbench AI benchmark numbers which are as follows:

Geekbench AI "ONNX" CPU (Higher is Better)
Single Precision
Half Precision
Quantized Score
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
3865
1525
6228
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
3216
1483
6144
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370)
2925
1425
5615
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
2338
1223
4695
Geekbench AI "ONNX" DirectML (Higher is Better)
Single Precision
Half Precision
Quantized Score
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
7668
9781
5280
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370)
7667
10643
5893
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
7618
14097
5332
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
6799
9297
5380
Geekbench AI "OpenVINO" (Higher is Better)
Single Precision
Half Precision
Quantized Score
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V/GPU)
10524
23874
27175
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H/GPU)
9504
18769
22718
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365/CPU)
4522
4620
11679
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H/NPU)
4144
8248
11898
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H/CPU)
4151
3134
9544
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370)
3398
3457
7511
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V/NPU)
2998
20336
28887
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V/CPU)
2991
1739
7664

For UL Procyon, we again see Intel's latest CPUs and its various AI accelerators such as the NPU and the GPU, offering better performance capabilities than the Ryzen AI offerings. AMD's Ryzen AI does come out faster in the Integer Precision test but the rest of the wins go to the blue team.

UL Procyon AI Suite With NPU "Integer Precision" (Higher is Better)
Score
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V/NPU)
1751
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365/NPU)
1732
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370/NPU)
1730
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V/GPU)
1417
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H/GPU)
1177
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H/NPU)
684
UL Procyon AI Text Generation (Higher is Better)
Score
Average TTFT (Seconds)
Average OTS (Tokens/s)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
888
1.24
21.46
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
616
1.42
11.82
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370/NPU)
260
13.04
19.35
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
233
13.08
15.53
UL Procyon AI Image Generation "Stable Diffusion 1.5 FP16" (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
Generation Speed (s/image)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V/GPU @ INT8)
2313
13.505
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H/GPU @ INT8)
1858
16.816
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V/GPU)
358
17.420
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H/GPU)
344
18.124
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370/GPU)
170
36.648
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365/GPU)
95
65.414

OneXPlayer X1 Pro Gaming Handheld - GPU Synthetic Performance

Now we are going to look at the GPU performance and before we present to you the gaming numbers, we first have to see how the performance fares in synthetic benchmarks. For this purpose, we first want to outline the single precision FLOPs each iGPU offers. Intel's Arc and AMD's Radeon series are based on entirely different architectures and despite the FLOPS of the Radeon iGPU being higher, it doesn't necessarily mean that the Radeon iGPU will be faster. But with that said, the following is how the two chips compare:

Single Precision Flops "FP32" (Higher is Better)
GFLOPS
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Radeon 890M)
7492
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
6037
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
4790
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
3982

In 3DMark Speed Way, we see the Radeon iGPU narrowly beating the Alchemist+ iGPU. Speed Way is a very intensive benchmark that uses ray tracing so Intel at least needs to work on some GPU-centric optimizations here.

3DMark Speed Way (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
896
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Radeon 890M)
537
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
511
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
479

For 3DMark Steel Nomad, we get to see our first non-RT performance of the Intel iGPU and here the blue team leads by a massive 40.6%.

3DMark Steel Nomad (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
827
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
823
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Radeon 890M)
588
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
524

In 3DMark Port Royal, Intel's Arc iGPUs offer a 27.4% lead over the fastest Radeon iGPU. This is a ray tracing-heavy benchmark and goes off to show that the results we saw in the Speed Way test are an anomaly, something that you will also notice in the gaming tests.

3DMark Port Royal (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
2146
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
1843
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Radeon 890M)
1684
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
1515

In 3DMark Time Spy, the AMD Radeon 890M iGPU is 6% faster than the Radeon 880M.

3DMark Time Spy (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
Graphics Score
CPU Score
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
4396
4112
7238
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
4447
4047
10136
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Radeon 890M)
3489
3150
8944
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
3297
2965
9024

For Fire Strike, Intel offers great performance even on DX11 APIs, which is a good showcase as many games still run DX11. The Radeon 890M ends up 5.5% faster than the Radeon 880M here.

3DMark Fire Strike (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
Graphics Score
Physics Score
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
9153
10138
22169
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
8315
8902
27466
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Radeon 890M)
7657
8291
24392
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
7322
7866
23949

Lastly, we have 3DMark Night Raid where Intel scores another comfortable lead with its new Arc 140T iGPU. Once again, the Radeon 890M offers 6% better performance than the Radeon 880M.

3DMark Night Raid (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
Graphics Score
CPU Score
0
9000
18000
27000
36000
45000
54000
0
9000
18000
27000
36000
45000
54000
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
35222
46927
14595
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
32715
40055
16050
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Radeon 890M)
28717
36909
12720
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
27742
34860
12861

OneXPlayer X1 Pro Gaming Handheld - HD Gaming Performance

With the synthetic performance out of the way, we can start taking a look at pure gaming numbers and we start off our testing spree with Cyberpunk 2077 running at Medium Preset at 1200P. With Balanced XeSS/FSR upscaling, we can see that while the upscaling-only results for the Radeon 890M are a bit behind, with frame-gen, you can see performance parity with Intel's top iGPU-solutions, a fantastic result for a 30W only scenario.

Cyberpunk 2077 (1200P, Medium Preset)
Average FPS (Balanced Upscaling)
Average FPS (Balanced FSR Frame-Gen)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V XeSS)
55.64
76.55
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Radeon 890M FSR)
46.75
76.30
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T XeSS)
45.02
63.50
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M FSR)
40.15
59.93

In Forza Horizon 5, we only ran the game using Quality Upscaling at the Medium Preset at 1200P, and the Radeon 890M offered the fastest performance of all the iGPUs tested with a 27% gain over the Radeon 880M and a 14% gain over the Arc solutions.

Forza Horizon 5 (1200p, Medium, Quality Upscaling)
Average FPS
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Radeon 890M FSR)
71
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T XeSS)
62
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V XeSS)
61
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M FSR)
56

In F1 24, AMD's Radeon 890M once again offers a strong uplift over the Radeon 880M with a 40% gain in both upscaling and frame-gen scenarios.

F1 24 (1200P, High Preset)
Average FPS (Balanced Upscaling)
Average FPS (Balanced Frame-Gen)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Radeon 890M FSR)
59
96
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V XeSS)
54
81
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T XeSS)
54
80
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M FSR)
42
69

In Horizon Zero Dawn at the "Favor Quality" preset, we used the FSR 2 upscaling set to Balanced. Here, the Radeon 890M delivers up to 58 FPS, once again showcasing the fastest iGPU performance in this particular title.

Horizon Zero Dawn (1200p, Favor Quality, FSR2 On)
Average FPS
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Radeon 890M)
58
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
56
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
51
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V XeSS)
46

Metro Exodus also runs great on the Arc 140T, offering the bare minimum 30 FPS with RT enabled at 1080P at the high preset while the Radeon 880M struggles to reach the 30 FPS mark & the same was the case with the Radeon 890M.

Metro Exodus (1080p, High Preset, RT Normal)
Average FPS
0
6
12
18
24
30
36
0
6
12
18
24
30
36
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
30.47
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
28.30
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Radeon 890M)
23.33
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
22.19

Lastly, we have The Callisto Protocol where both iGPUs are very similar in performance but offer FPS in the mid-30s range even with FSR 2 enabled. It would be better to lower the resolution to get a better playing experience but still, over 30 FPS is decent for these iGPUs.

The Callisto Protocol (1200p, Medium, FSR2 On)
Average FPS
0
8
16
24
32
40
48
0
8
16
24
32
40
48
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Radeon 890M)
44.92
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
43.4
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
37.5
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
34.6

OneXPlayer X1 Pro Gaming Handheld - Thermals, Power & Battery

A major factor of today's laptops is their power consumption. For our tests, all handhelds and laptops are set to their "Balanced" preset by default but you can opt into the "Performance" mode through the BIOS which lets you access the "Best Performance" profiles in Windows. The X1 Pro is thermally constrained versus laptops and hence, it has a maximum TDP of 30W but ends up with much higher efficiency given the numbers that we have just witnessed.

Power Ratings & Consumption
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Radeon 890M)
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
OOB TDP
35
28
28
17
PL1 Peak
64
30
48
37
Idle Power
2.88
4.16
3.19
2.28
Media Playback
9
6
6
4.5
Gaming Power
40
30
32
32
Peak Power
73
30
71
42

Once again, due to thermal constraints, the OneXPlayer X1 Pro runs a tad bit hot with up to 77C temps in gaming. The solution comes with a single-fan, an aluminum heatsink, and copper heat pipes but cooling capabilities are limited by the compact nature of this handheld. This is still far from worrisome temps.

Temperatures
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Idle
38
42
44
47
Gaming
66
60
70
77
Peak
97
70
91
73

The OneXPlayer X1 Pro comes with a 65.02 Wh battery capacity and a 16,890 mAh pack. This leads to decent enough battery times which can get you around 3-4 hours worth of gaming at the full 30 Watts mode and even more with the 15W mode.

Battery Capacity
Whr
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
99
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
82
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
72
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370)
65
Battery Tests
UL Office Productivity (Battery Minutes)
Gaming Performance (Battery Minutes)
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
1311
284
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
1224
258
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
752
187
OneXPlayer X1 Pro (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @30W)
699
162

Conclusion - A Powerful Handheld With A Strong iGPU

The AMD Ryzen AI 300 APU family has been the top selection for modern-day gaming handhelds. It has seen a wider adoption in such designs versus the Intel offerings and the reason is simple, AMD has been offering a great balance of high performance and high efficiency with its chips. Intel only managed to close the gap very recently with its Lunar Lake and Arrow Lake options but AMD has been offering these chips for almost a year now.

The result is that manufacturers have had more time to optimize the hardware and software for AMD's chips. As such, you can get a wide variety of options based on AMD APUs such as the X1 Pro from OneXPlayer.

In terms of performance, the OneXPlayer X1 Pro offers great gaming capabilities, often securing the top position in the gaming tests that we conducted. It supports AMD's latest software technologies which are handy when gaming on these compact handhelds. FSR, Frame-Gen, and Fluid Motion Frames can lead to smoother gameplay but we often saw that the native performance even at 1920x1200 was very playable in some modern titles with a good quality preset.

The OneXPlayer X1 Pro is limited to just 30W but you can fine-tune it between 4W and up to 30W depending on your needs. So if you are just browsing, watching movies, or playing casual games, a lower TDP would be perfect to deliver long-lasting battery times and for plugged-in gaming, you can go for that 30W. The chassis does get a bit warm but you'll mostly be holding the handheld from the joysticks which feel comfortable and very durable. They are easy to access and are very easy to remove/install. Another thing that you can do is to convert the handheld to your choice of device. It can be turned into a tablet, a laptop, or a handheld so you aren't restricted to just hand-held use.

The display on the OneXPlayer X1 Pro is also superb with a maximum 2560x1600 resolution and a 120Hz refresh rate in a 16:10 aspect ratio. The glossy screen almost felt like an OLED panel at first but it does give that premium look. The device also supports 100W PD so you can get it charged from 0% to 100% in under an hour. The folks over at OneXPlayer nailed the looks and feel of this handheld option.

Pricing of the OneXPlayer X1 Pro is currently listed for $1359 US which makes it one of the most expensive and premium handheld options on the market but you are getting the top AMD Ryzen AI 300 chip along with a 11" screen and strong performance. It is also a 3-in-1 design for multi-use & all of these reasons make it a compelling option. For those who want a handheld-only experience, you can also look into the OneXFly F1 Pro which is a strong gaming handheld under $1000 US and we are going to have a look at it soon too.

 

You can find additional information about our hardware review process and ethics policy here.

Button