GMKtec NucBox K13 “Intel Core Ultra 7 256V” Mini PC Review: Lunar Lake In A Pocket-Sized Machine

Mar 11, 2026 at 08:00am EDT
A GMKtec mini PC with an Intel Core Ultra 7 label is positioned on a wooden surface next to its open box against a vibrant computer case backdrop.

GMKtec has been making Mini PCs for years now. They are based out of the technology hub of Shenzen, China, and have maintained strategic partnerships with AMD, Intel & Microsoft, and currently offer a wide array of solutions, all the way from entry-level to enthusiast-grade designs based on mobility chips from AMD & Intel.

The latest offering from GMKtec that targets mainstream users is the NucBox K13, a small form factor design that is equipped with Intel's Lunar Lake SoCs, specifically the Core Ultra 7 256V. We have already tested this SoC on 14" laptops, so now let's see what kind of performance it offers on a compact Mini PC.

Related Story Rumor Claims Intel Coyote Cove P-Cores For Nova Lake CPUs Have Higher IPC, But Lower Clocks Than AMD’s Zen 6

GMKtec NucBox K13 Mini PC - Specifications At A Glance

In terms of specifications, the GMKtec NucBox K13 is equipped with the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V CPU. This is one of the many Lunar Lake SoCs in the Core Ultra Series 2 lineup, with specs that mostly match those of the higher-end SKUs. The only difference is that it runs at a slightly lower clock speed and supports 16 GB of onboard LP5X memory.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 256V is based on TSMC's N3B process technology in a tiled fashion. It features a total of 8 cores, of which 4 are based on the Lion Cove P-Core architecture, while the rest of the 4 cores are based on the Skymont LP E-Core architecture. The CPU carries 12 MB of Intel Smart Cache.

The CPU has a base frequency of 2.2 GHz for both the P-Cores and LPE cores, while the boost frequencies are rated at 4.8 GHz for the P-Cores and 3.7 GHz for the E-Cores. The chip has a base power rated at 17W, a minimum assured power of 8W, and can dial up to 30W at the standard boost and 37W at MTP.

For the iGPU, Intel's Lunar Lake CPUs pack the Xe2 architecture. The configuration specific to the Core Ultra 7 256V is the Arc 140V, which offers 8 Xe2 cores rated at up to 1.95 GHz clock speeds.

The iGPU supports all the latest APIs and AI Frameworks; you will get newer Ray Tracing Units and even support for XMX, which is far better than the DP4a model on the older Alchemist-based iGPUs. This allows games with RT to run a bit faster, while XMX enables better support for AI-based upscaling methods such as XeSS and also supports XeSS3 Multi Frame-Generation. The GPU itself is rated at 67 INT8 TOPS.

The chip in total offers 120 platform TOPS, which include 48 TOPS from the NPU4 and 5 TOPS from the CPU itself. The new NPU supports the latest AI frameworks such as Open VINO, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, and WebNN.

Intel Lunar Lake "Core Ultra 200V" CPU Lineup:

SKU NameCores / ThreadsCache (LLC)P-Core / E-Core BoostGPU (Max Clock)PL1/Min/MTPMemory ConfigurationNPU / XMX (GPU) TOPs
Core Ultra 9 288V8/812 MB5.1 / 3.7 GHzArc 140V @ 2.05 GHz30/17/37W32 GB (2R) LPDDR5X48/67
Core Ultra 7 268V8/812 MB5.0 / 3.7 GHzArc 140V @ 2.00 GHz17/8/37W32 GB (2R) LPDDR5X48/66
Core Ultra 7 266V8/812 MB5.0 / 3.7 GHzArc 140V @ 2.00 GHz17/8/37W16 GB (1R) LPDDR5X48/66
Core Ultra 7 258V8/812 MB4.8 / 3.7 GHzArc 140V @ 1.95 GHz17/8/37W32 GB (2R) LPDDR5X47/64
Core Ultra 7 256V8/812 MB4.8 / 3.7 GHzArc 140V @ 1.95 GHz17/8/37W16 GB (1R) LPDDR5X47/64
Core Ultra 5 238V8/88 MB4.7 / 3.5 GHzArc 130V @ 1.85 GHz17/8/37W32 GB (2R) LPDDR5X40/53
Core Ultra 5 236V8/88 MB4.7 / 3.5 GHzArc 130V @ 1.85 GHz17/8/37W16 GB (1R) LPDDR5X40/53
Core Ultra 5 228V8/88 MB4.5 / 3.5 GHzArc 130V @ 1.85 GHz17/8/37W32 GB (2R) LPDDR5X40/53
Core Ultra 5 226V8/88 MB4.5 / 3.5 GHzArc 130V @ 1.85 GHz17/8/37W16 GB (1R) LPDDR5X40/53

With the internals of the CPU covered, let's talk about the rest of the specifications. First, we have the memory, which comes in the form of 16 GB of LPDDR5x. The Lunar Lake SoC comes pre-configured with on-package LPDDR5X memory, and the memory capacity is defined by the SKU itself. The SKUs ending with "6" support 16 GB LP5X, while the ones ending with "8" support 32 GB LP5X capacities. These are the only two options you can get with Lunar Lake. The LPDDR5x modules on the GMKtec K13 operate at 8533 MT/s.

Our review unit was equipped with a 1 TB Huawei eKitStor Xtreme 200E PCIe Gen4 SSD, which offers 7000/6500 MB/s of Read & Write speeds, respectively. You can upgrade the storage up to 8 TB thanks to a secondary M.2 SSD slot.

IO includes two USB 3.2 Gen2 10 Gbps ports, a 3.5mm Audio jack, and a Power button on the front. The backside features a 5GbE LAN port, a USB 2.0 port, an HDMI 2.1 output, two USB4 Type-C 40 Gbps (PD3.0 @ 100W / DP1.4) ports, a DC IN 5525 port, and a Security Lock slot.

Talking a little bit about the BIOS, it is very barebones for the NucBox K13. The first page lists down the various information about the Mini PC and has one important setting, the "Power Limit Select". This gives three options: High-Performance mode with a 30W target, Balanced mode with a 20W target, and Quiet mode with a 15W target.

GMKtec NucBox K13 Mini PC - Unboxing & A Closer Look

The GMKtec NucBox K13 comes inside a small package with a gold GMKtec logo engraved on the front.

The back of the box has some basic specifications that list the specific configuration for this model. We got the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V variant with 32 GB of memory and a 1 TB SSD.

Within the box, you can find the Mini PC in the top compartment, along with a guide/warranty booklet, the power adapter, the power cable, and an HDMI cable underneath the box. The adapter offers 100W of power to the system.

I have tested a lot of GMKtec Mini PCs, but the K13 stands out the most. While the previous designs went with a squareish look, the K13 goes for a rectangular look. It is a super compact design that looks nice and is only slightly larger than a standard-sized smartphone.

There are five exhaust vents/ports on the K13. Two on the bottom, two on the sides, and one on the back. Despite its compact nature, GMKtec managed to fit a blower fan inside the chassis.

The front I/O on the GMKtec NucBox K13 Mini PC comes with a Power Button, two USB 3.2 10 Gbps ports, and a 3.5mm audio jack.

The back I/O on the GMKtec NucBox K13 includes a DC IN 5525 connector, one USB 2.0 port, 2 USB4 Type-C ports, 5 GbE LAN, and an HDMI 2.1 port.

To access the internals, you have to unscrew a single screw on the bottom, which lifts the green plate.

Upon removing the top cover, you are first greeted by a large aluminum frame that covers the internal PCB. You can find the CMOS battery, two M.2 slots (one occupied by the pre-installed SSD), and a WIFI card.

GMKtec NucBox K13 Mini PC - CPU Performance

We start by comparing the 3DMark CPU Profile tests.

3DMark CPU Profile (Higher is Better)
Max Threads
16 Threads
8 Threads
4 Threads
2 Threads
1 Thread
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
10207
10377
7820
4843
2464
1248
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @54W)
8538
8399
7602
4445
2273
1157
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
7650
7688
5893
4011
2230
1266
Geekom A9 MAX (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
7633
7640
5890
4008
2226
1265
GMKtec K13 (Core Ultra 7 256V @30W)
5789
5756
5770
3773
2182
1146
Blender "Samples Per Minute"  (Higher is Better)
monster
junkshop
classroom
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @54W)
163
114
84
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
120
80.2
62.8
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
115
89.2
70.4
Geekom A9 MAX (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
114
88.6
68.9
GMKtec K13 (Core Ultra 7 256V @30W)
65
43
31
CPU-z 2.13.0 (Higher is Better)
Single-Core
Multi-Core
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @54W)
794.1
11100
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
836.0
9053.3
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
802.1
7446
Geekom A9 MAX (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
800.8
7440
GMKtec K13 (Core Ultra 7 256V @30W)
749.4
5009
Cinebench 2024 (Higher is Better)
Single-Core
Multi-Core
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @54W)
115
1383
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
126
1101
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
121
1010
Geekom A9 MAX (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
121
1007
GMKtec K13 (Core Ultra 7 256V @30W)
120
606
Geekbench 6 (Higher is Better)
Single-Core
Multi-Core
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @54W)
2940
17371
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
2920
15887
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
2948
12377
Geekom A9 MAX (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
2940
12358
GMKtec K13 (Core Ultra 7 256V @30W)
2711
11105
UL Procyon Office Suite (Higher is Better)
Word
Excel
PowerPoint
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @54W)
9027
7399
9027
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
7921
6653
7894
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
6569
6350
7075
Geekom A9 MAX (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
6560
6340
7071
GMKtec K13 (Core Ultra 7 256V @30W)
6203
6180
6631
Winrar 7.13 (Higher is Better)
Speed (KB/s)
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @54W)
25672
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
19333
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
15787
Geekom A9 MAX (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
15502
GMKtec K13 (Core Ultra 7 256V @30W)
8991

GMKtec NucBox K13 Mini PC - AI Synthetic Performance

Next up, we have our first AI benchmarks for the latest Intel and AMD CPUs. First up, we have the Geekbench AI benchmark numbers, which are as follows:

Geekbench AI "ONNX" CPU (Higher is Better)
Single Precision
Half Precision
Quantized Score
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @1120W)
6907
2471
11438
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
3870
1525
6228
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
3220
1490
6140
Geekom A9 MAX (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
3224
1488
6135
GMKtec K13 (Core Ultra 7 256V @30W)
2340
1248
4772
Geekbench AI "ONNX" DirectML (Higher is Better)
Single Precision
Half Precision
Quantized Score
0
7000
14000
21000
28000
35000
42000
0
7000
14000
21000
28000
35000
42000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @120W)
26480
36101
20661
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
7674
9783
5288
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
7660
10650
5890
GMKtec K13 (Core Ultra 7 256V @30W)
7684
14110
5468
Geekom A9 MAX (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
7655
10642
5881

For UL Procyon, we again see Intel's latest CPUs and its various AI accelerators, such as the NPU and the GPU, offering better performance capabilities than the Ryzen AI offerings.

UL Procyon AI Text Generation
Score
Average TTFT (Seconds)
Average OTS (Tokens/s)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @120W)
894
2.57
45.12
GMKtec K13 (Core Ultra 7 256V @30W)
892
1.24
22.37
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
619
1.44
11.87
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
265
13.07
19.39
Geekom A9 MAX (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
13.09
19.45
UL Procyon AI Image Generation "Stable Diffusion 1.5 FP16" (Lower is Better)
Overall Score
Generation Speed (s/image)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
GMKtec K13 (Core Ultra 7 258V/GPU @ INT8)
2330
13.502
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @120W/GPU)
663
56.491
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H/GPU)
47
17.002
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370/GPU)
166
34.143
Geekom A9 MAX (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
168
35.718

With 120 TOPs of AI compute at its disposal, the GPU and NPU combination provides strong AI numbers.

GMKtec NucBox K13 Mini PC - GPU Synthetic Performance

Now we are going to look at the GPU performance, and before we present to you the gaming numbers, we first have to see how the performance fares in synthetic benchmarks. For this purpose, we first want to outline the single-precision FLOPs each iGPU offers. Intel's Arc and AMD's Radeon series are based on entirely different architectures, and despite the FLOPS of the Radeon iGPU being higher, it doesn't necessarily mean that the Radeon iGPU will be faster. But with that said, the following is how the two chips compare:

Single Precision Flops "FP32" (Higher is Better)
GFLOPS
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S)
26959
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M)
7562
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M)
7446
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T)
4890
GMKtec K13 (Arc 140V)
4001
3DMark Speed Way (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S)
2030
GMKtec K13 (Arc 140V)
908
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M)
551
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M)
550
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T)
489

For 3DMark Steel Nomad, we get to see our first non-RT performance of these iGPUs. Once again, this is almost a 4x lead for the Radeon 8060S, almost matching the RTX 4060/RTX 5050 graphics cards.

3DMark Steel Nomad (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S)
2194
GMKtec K13 (Arc 140V)
836
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T)
835
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M)
570
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M)
566

In 3DMark Port Royal, the Radeon 8060S is up to 3.5x faster than the entry-level iGPUs. Once again, very close to the RTX 4060/RTX 5050 graphics cards.

3DMark Port Royal (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S)
5861
GMKtec K13 (Arc 140V)
2153
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T)
1877
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M)
1699
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M)
1678

In 3DMark Time Spy, the Radeon 8060S is over 3.5x faster than the entry-level iGPUs. The chip exceeds the performance offered by RTX 4060/RTX 5050 graphics cards.

3DMark Time Spy (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
Graphics Score
CPU Score
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S)
11148
11344
10157
GMKtec K13 (Arc 140V)
4411
4088
10201
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T)
4511
4112
11399
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M)
3578
3202
10984
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M)
3552
3200
10948

For Fire Strike, Intel offers great performance even on DX11 APIs, which is a good showcase, as many games still run DX11. The Radeon 8060S crushes the entry-level iGPUs and puts out 10-15% better performance than the RTX 4060/RTX 5050 graphics cards.

3DMark Fire Strike (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
Graphics Score
Physics Score
0
7000
14000
21000
28000
35000
42000
0
7000
14000
21000
28000
35000
42000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S)
26851
30497
32166
GMKtec K13 (Arc 140V)
9195
10179
22166
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T)
8660
9011
29501
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M)
7802
8370
24666
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M)
7784
8356
24649

Lastly, we have 3DMark Night Raid, where the Radeon 8060S manages to come close to even the flagship RTX 5090 Blackwell (Mobile) GPU.

3DMark Night Raid (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
Graphics Score
CPU Score
0
21095
42190
63285
84380
105475
126570
0
21095
42190
63285
84380
105475
126570
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S)
68887
126570
19229
GMKtec K13 (Arc 140V)
35316
47101
14606
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T)
33172
41110
16738
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M)
29303
37224
13004
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M)
29300
37220
13001

GMKtec NucBox K13 Mini PC - HD Gaming Performance

With the synthetic performance out of the way, we can start taking a look at pure gaming numbers, and we start off our testing spree with Cyberpunk 2077 running at Medium Preset at 1080p with Balanced XeSS/FSR upscaling.

Cyberpunk 2077 (1080p, Medium Preset)
Average FPS (Balanced Upscaling)
Average FPS (Balanced FSR Frame-Gen)
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @54W)
111.92
166.7
GMKtec K13 (Arc 140V @30W)
60.11
91.12
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M @70W)
59.72
90.80
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M @70W)
58.55
88.12
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T @70W)
58.12
78.05

In Forza Horizon 5, we only ran the game using Quality Upscaling at the Medium Preset at 1080p.

Forza Horizon 5 (1080p, Medium, Quality Upscaling)
Average FPS
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @54W)
156
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
95
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
93
GMKtec K13 (Arc 140V @30W)
91
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T XeSS @70W)
88

In F1 24, we used the High Preset at 1080p.

F1 24 (1080p, High Preset)
Average FPS (Balanced Upscaling)
Average FPS (Balanced Frame-Gen)
0
70
140
210
280
350
420
0
70
140
210
280
350
420
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @54W)
169
305
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
74
110
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
72
107
GMKtec K13 (Arc 140V @30W)
70
102
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T XeSS @70W)
69
98

In Horizon Zero Dawn at the "Favor Quality" preset, we used the FSR 2 upscaling set to Balanced.

Horizon Zero Dawn (1080p, Favor Quality, FSR2 On)
Average FPS
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @54W)
131
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
70
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
68
GMKtec K13 (Arc 140V @30W)
68
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T XeSS @70W)
63

Metro Exodus also runs great, offering up to 101 FPS using the High Preset and RT set to Normal at 1080p.

Metro Exodus (1080p, High Preset, RT Normal)
Average FPS
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @54W)
63.18
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T XeSS @70W)
44.83
GMKtec K13 (Arc 140V @30W)
40.22
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
33.25
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
31.88

Lastly, we have The Callisto Protocol, which runs flawlessly at the provided settings.

The Callisto Protocol (1080p, Medium, FSR2 On)
Average FPS
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @54W)
96.54
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
55.97
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
53.82
GMKtec K13 (Arc 140V @30W)
52.38
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T XeSS @70W)
50.08

Borderlands 4 is a heavy game to run, but the Radeon 8060S can manage a solid 60 FPS at 1080p High using Quality upscaling (FSR3) while enabling frame-gen nets you over 100 FPS. The entry-level iGPUs barely manage 30 FPS even with frame-gen enabled at the same settings.

Borderlands 4 (1080p, High)
Average FPS (Quality Upscaling)
Average FPS (Quality Frame-Gen)
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @54W)
56.48
105.66
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
16.11
29.30
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
16.05
29.11
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T XeSS @70W)
15.88
28.65
GMKtec K13 (Arc 140V @30W)
14.98
28.21

GMKtec NucBox K13 Mini PC - Power & Thermals

Next, we can see the power consumption of the latest Mini PCs.

Package Power (Lower is Better)
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @ 54W)
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
Geekom A9 Max (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
GMKtec K13 (Core Ultra 7 256V @30W)
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
Idle
6
7
6
5
3
Gaming
45
70
70
70
30
Peak
54
75
70
70
37
Peak Rating
100
150
92
90
37

Following thermals, we have temperatures:

Temperatures
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @ 54W)
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
Geekom A9 Max (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
GMKtec K13 (Core Ultra 7 256V @30W)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Idle
42
45
42
40
41
Gaming
49
77
70
66
60
Peak
59
97
85
80
68

Conclusion - K13 Is A Spectacular Little Powerhouse

We have been impressed with Intel's Lunar Lake CPUs since their launch, and this is my first time trying out a Mini PC featuring this chip.

In terms of CPU performance, Lunar Lake is a perfect fit for your lightweight productivity and office requirements. It may not be the fastest chip around, but for its size, it works great. And the 30W TDP means that you can have it running on a battery pack if you don't have socket power near you. Game performance is too good, given that this is rocking a Battlemage-powered chip. Arc 140V with Xe2 is XeSS3 ready and supports multi-frame-generation too, bringing solid-fast FPS that rival Radeon 890M.

The hidden aspect of Lunar Lake is that it can also be used as a very speedy AI box, too, with 120 TOPS of compute power. Running OpenClaw, or using this machine as a GenAI machine, is fantastic, and with the solid Intel Open framework and APIs, you can expect solid performance and support for various LLMs.

In terms of IO, the GMKtec K13 has an ample amount of ports with dual USB 3.2 on the front, dual USB4 on the back, and a 5GbE LAN in addition to Wi-Fi 6E. You can also install two M.2 SSDs with up to 8 TB of capacity supported. The one downside is that you are limited in terms of memory. It would be nice if the company offered a Core Ultra 7 258V option with 32 GB of memory, as 16 GB can be slightly on the lower side. With that said, the temperatures were good with the machine never going above 60 °C under games or apps.

I really enjoyed my time testing the GMKtec K13, it's a solid little machine with great CPU performance, great GPU performance, and lots of AI power, alongwith a nice set of IO capabilities in a compact form factor.

The GMKtec NucBox K13 can be bought from the following links (Official Page):

About the author: A Software Engineer by training and a PC enthusiast by passion, Hassan Mujtaba serves as Wccftech's Senior Editor for hardware section. With years of experience in the industry, he specializes in deep-dive technical analysis of next-generation CPU and GPU architectures, motherboards, and cooling solutions. His work involves not only breaking news on upcoming technologies but also extensive hands-on reviews and benchmarking.

Follow Wccftech on Google to get more of our news coverage in your feeds.