cover
Hardware

GMKtec EVO-X2 AI “AMD Ryzen AI MAX+ 395” Mini PC: The World’s Most Powerful SoC For AI, Gaming & Everything

Hassan Mujtaba

GMKtec has been making Mini PCs for years now. They are based out of the technology hub of Shenzen, China, and have maintained strategic partnerships with AMD, Intel & Microsoft, and currently offer a wide array of solutions, all the way from entry-level to enthusiast-grade designs based on mobility chips from AMD & Intel.

The latest offering from GMKtek that targets high-end users is the Evo X2, a small form factor design that is equipped with AMD's most powerful SoC to date, the Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 (internally codenamed Strix Halo). This SoC takes everything we know about Strix "Ryzen AI 300" series, takes it into overdrive mode with a chiplet architecture, and offers incredibly powerful specs.

Related Story Erying Intros Intel Core Ultra 200H MoDT Motherboards: Up To 285H 16-Core On A mATX Motherboard Starting At Just $140 US

The GMKtec EVO X2 not only houses the top Strix Halo APU, but it also features a wide array of IO and a strong set of internal specs, such as storage and memory. We've been waiting to get our hands on AMD's Ryzen AI MAX+ chips, and now that we finally have our hands on one thanks to GMKtec, we can finally see if this product really holds up to its "Halo" design.

GMKtec EVO X2 Mini PC - Specifications At A Glance

In terms of specifications, the GMKtec EVO X2 is equipped with the AMD Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 APU. This is the flagship processor within the Strix Halo lineup, which is purpose-built as a Mini Workstation platform, and has a lot to talk about, so let's get started.

The AMD Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 APU features 16 cores in total with 32 threads, and is based on TSMC's 4nm process technology. Unlike the standard Strix lineup, which mixes Zen 5 and Zen 5C cores, the Strix Halo family features the full-fledged, high-performance Zen 5C cores. These 16 cores are packaged within two Core Complexes or CCX chiplets, each housing 8 cores and 32 MB of L3 cache for a total of 64 MB & 16 MB of L2 on the CPU side.

The CPU has a base frequency of 3.0 GHz. The Zen 5 cores clock up to 5.1 GHz and have a TDP rating of 55W at default, which can be configured down to 45W and up to 120W. The SoC is featured on the FP11 platform and is BGA in design.

For the iGPU, AMD is using its latest RDNA 3.5 architecture, which is a slightly upgraded & more efficient variant of the RDNA 3 architecture.

The AMD Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 features a massive integrated GPU core on the same interposer that is located within its IOD chiplet. This GPU is massive because it features 40 compute units, up from 12 CUs on the top Ryzen AI 300 "Strix" APU. The GPU clocks in at a maximum frequency of 2900 MHz.

The RDNA 3.5 iGPUs support all the latest APIs and AI Frameworks. Plus, RDNA 3.5 also supports the latest upscaling and frame generation features, such as FSR 2, FSR 3, FSR 3 Frame-Gen, and AFMF2, while adding advanced latency reduction technologies such as Anti-Lag 2. It's one of the fastest iGPUs on the market right now.

On the NPU side, the AMD Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 is equipped with an XDNA 2 NPU, which offers a peak TOPS of 50 and supports all the latest AI frameworks. This is the fastest NPU in terms of AI TOPS in the market right now, and the only thing that comes close is the 48 TOPS of the Lunar Lake lineup. But since there's also a massive GPU at disposal, the SoC offers a total AI compute of 126 TOPs.

AMD Ryzen AI 300 APUs:

CPU NameArchitectureCores / ThreadsClock Speeds (Max)Cache (Total)AI CapabilitiesiGPUTDP
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375Zen 5 / Zen 5C12/242.0 / 5.1 GHz36 MB / 24 MB L385 AI TOPs (55 TOPS NPU)Radeon 890M (16 CU @ 2.9 GHz)28W (cTDP 15-54W)
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375Zen 5 / Zen 5C12/242.0 / 5.1 GHz36 MB / 24 MB L3Radeon 890M (16 CU @ 2.9 GHz)28W (cTDP 15-54W)
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370Zen 5 / Zen 5C12/242.0 / 5.1 GHz36 MB / 24 MB L385 AI TOPs (55 TOPS NPU)Radeon 890M (16 CU @ 2.9 GHz)28W (cTDP 15-54W)
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370Zen 5 / Zen 5C12/242.0 / 5.1 GHz36 MB / 24 MB L380 AI TOPs (50 TOPS NPU)Radeon 890M (16 CU @ 2.9 GHz)28W (cTDP 15-54W)
Ryzen AI 7 365Zen 5 / Zen 5C10/202.0 / 5.0 GHz30 MB / 20 MB L380 AI TOPs (50 TOPS NPU)Radeon 880M (12 CU @ 2.9 GHz)28W (cTDP 15-54W)
Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360Zen 5 / Zen 5C8/162.0 / 5.0 GHz24 MB / 16 MB L380 AI TOPs (50 TOPS NPU)Radeon 880M (12 CU @ TBD GHz)28W (cTDP 15-54W)

With the internals of the SoC covered, let's talk about the rest of the specifications. First, we have the memory, which comes in the form of 64 GB of LPDDR5x. The Mini PC comes pre-configured and pre-soldered in 96 GB and 128 GB options too. The LPDDR5x modules on the GMKtek EVO X2 operate at 8000 MT/s across a 256-bit wide bus interface.

This wider memory bus is available on AMD's Ryzen AI MAX+ APUs, allowing for up to 256 GB/s of bandwidth. This is essential since the GPU itself only has 32 MB of cache onboard, which means that the LPDDR5x subsystem is what will be used as the primary means of communication.

LPDDR5x is fast, but we expect that AMD will move to the newer LPDDR6 standards as soon as the next-gen Halo chips arrive to further offset the bandwidth requirements. The RDNA 3.5 architecture also has a decent memory compression algorithm, which can reduce some of the bandwidth needs.

The biggest advantage of Strix Halo APUs is that you can dedicate large pools of memory to the iGPU, making them a strong solution for LLMs. Our solution can dedicate up to 32 GB of memory to the iGPU alone, showing it as a GPU with 32 GB of available VRAM. The higher-end EVO X2 configurations can also be configured with up to 96 GB of VRAM for the GPU (the system retains at least 16 GB of memory for the system). This makes for a strong AI solution and an even better gaming platform where graphics memory limitations can be bypassed by simply dedicating more system memory to the iGPU.

Our review unit was equipped with a 1 TB Crucial PCIe Gen4 SSD with a dedicated heatsink. The EVO X2 has two M.2 Gen4x4 slots, which can be equipped with 4 TB each for up to 8 TB of memory.

IO includes two USB 10 Gbps Type-A ports, 1 USB4 Type-C port, 1 SD card reader, 1 3.5mm audio jack, on the front, while the back includes two USB 2.0 Type-A ports, 1 USB 10 Gbps Type-A port, 1 USB4 Type-C port, 1 DP 1.4 port, 1 HDMI 2.1 port, another 3.5mm audio jack, a DC-in port, and a Kensington lock port.

Talking a little bit about the BIOS, it is very barebones for the EVO X2. The first page lists down the various information about the Mini PC and has one important setting, the "Power Mode Select". This gives three options: Performance mode with a 120W target, Balanced mode with an 85W target, and Quiet mode with a 54W target. In the advanced menu, you can find the graphics options from where you can enable UMA to set a custom frame buffer size for the GPU.

There are other CPU options too in the Advanced menu, but nothing that can further overclock the chip itself. The memory configuration options let you select "Auto" or manual clock speeds. These only go below the factory 8000 MT/s speeds. And finally, we have the fan speed control options. These can also be set using a fan mode button on the Mini PC itself.

GMKteck EVO X2 Mini PC - Unboxing & A Closer Look

The GMKtec EVO X2 comes inside a large package with a gold GMKtec logo engraved on the front.

The back of the box has some basic specifications that list the specific configuration for this model. We got the AMD Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 variant with 64 GB of memory and a 1 TB SSD.

Within the box, you can find the Mini PC in its old compartment, along with a guide/warranty booklet, the power adapter, the power cable, and an HDMI cable. The adapter is made by Huntkey with the specific model number being "HKA230195A2-0A7" and offers up to 230.1W of power to the system.

GMKtec's Mini PCs really do stand out from the rest of the market offerings, with a stylish dual-tone design. The front cover is all metallic with a silver hue, while the chassis is a mix of an outer plastic shell with an internal aluminum frame. The Mini PC is a bit on the chunky side, but for good reasons, as we will get to in a bit.

There are four exhaust vents/ports on the EVO X2. One under the top frame, two around the rear IO, and one on the sides. These ensure that the PC receives adequate airflow and remains cool with higher heat dissipation through the vents.

The front I/O on the GMKtec EVO X2 Mini PC comes with a Power Button, a Performance Mode toggle key, one SD card reader that supports SDXC, one USB 4.0 Type-C port, 2 USB 3.2 10 Gbps Type-A ports, 1 3.55mm audio jack, and a Fan-Mode button on the very top.

The back I/O on the GMKtec EVO X2 includes a DC IN 5525 connector, one 3.5mm audio jack, 1 USB 3.2 10 Gbps Type-A port, 1 USB4 Type-C port, 1 DP 1.4 (8.1 Gbps / HBR3) port, 1 HDMI 2.1 (FRL @ 8 Gbps) port, and two USB 2.0 ports.

The top Fan-Mode button can be used to change the fan speed. Interestingly, GMKtec lists this as a "Light Button" on its official page, but we weren't able to see any difference in RGB lighting when pressing the button.

To access the internals, you have to unscrew the two rubber feet at the bottom of the chassis. These are easy to remove.

Upon removing the top cover, you are first greeted by a large aluminum frame which houses a red-colored PCB and an 80mm fan with RGB illumination. This provides cooling to the backside of the PCB, which also houses the dual SSDs.

The back of the PCB has two PCIe Gen4 x4 slots, one of which is populated with a Crucial Gen4 1 TB SSD. Each slot can house 4 TB of storage capacity. There's also a MediaTek wireless card which offers Wi-Fi 7 & BT5.4 support. The unpopulated SSD slot states that the PC is running the v1.05 BIOS.

The other side of the motherboard houses the AMD Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 SoC, the LPDDR5x memory, and the power delivery. All of this is located under a large heatsink with two blower-style fans.

For cooling, GMKtec is using its latest Max 3.0 thermal system, which includes two blower-style fans that are attached to a full copper heatsink. The heatsink has a large surface area for dissipating heat and has a large copper baseplate that attaches over the three chiplets on the Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 SoC, & also the LPDDR5x memory. There are also subsections within the heatsink that make contact with the VRMs.

There are at least 26 VRM phases on the motherboard itself. The PCB features a very distinctive red PCB, which we haven't seen in a while, except some ASUS motherboards. It also feels a lot like a design that's similar to current-gen consoles with soldered memory and a large SoC taking the center stage.

Finally, we have the RGB illumination of the EVO X2. It's subtle and provides a good look.

GMKtek EVO X2 Mini PC - CPU Performance

We start by comparing the 3DMark CPU Profile tests.

3DMark CPU Profile (Higher is Better)
Max Threads
16 Threads
8 Threads
4 Threads
2 Threads
1 Thread
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
10207
10377
7820
4843
2464
1248
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @120W)
9757
9545
8120
4477
2275
1160
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @85W)
9691
9520
8149
4481
2287
1165
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @54W)
8538
8399
7602
4445
2273
1157
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
7650
7688
5893
4011
2230
1266
Geekom A9 MAX (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
7633
7640
5890
4008
2226
1265

In Blender, we used the standard monster, junkshop, and classroom tests for evaluation. The AI MAX+ 395 crushes the standard Strix with a lead of 80% despite there being just a 21.5% power difference, & 33.3% difference in core count. At 120W, it reaches a whole new level, being over twice as fast.

Blender "Samples Per Minute"  (Higher is Better)
monster
junkshop
classroom
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @120W)
231
155
125
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @85W)
205
141
109
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @54W)
163
114
84
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
120
80.2
62.8
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
115
89.2
70.4
Geekom A9 MAX (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
114
88.6
68.9

In CPU-Z, we tested the single-thread and multi-thread performance. While the single-thread performance is on par with the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, which also hits a max frequency of 5.1 GHz, the multi-core score is where we see the raw power of Strix Halo, claiming a 49.1% lead at 54W, 86% lead at 85W, and a 105% lead at 120W.

CPU-z 2.13.0 (Higher is Better)
Single-Core
Multi-Core
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @120W)
799.8
15249
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @85W)
793.6
13885
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @54W)
794.1
11100
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
836.0
9053.3
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
802.1
7446
Geekom A9 MAX (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
800.8
7440

For Cinebench 2024, we once again compared the single-core and multi-core performance. This is the same result, with Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 not only beating the 70W Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at 54W, but offering close to double the performance with a 120W TDP.

Cinebench 2024 (Higher is Better)
Single-Core
Multi-Core
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @120W)
116
1910
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @85W)
115
1723
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @54W)
115
1383
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
126
1101
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
121
1010
Geekom A9 MAX (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
121
1007

In Geekbench 6, we used the full-suite benchmark to evaluate the performance. Same story here, too.

Geekbench 6 (Higher is Better)
Single-Core
Multi-Core
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @120W)
2932
20968
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @85W)
2936
17733
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @54W)
2940
17371
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
2920
15887
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
2948
12377
Geekom A9 MAX (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
2940
12358

In UL Procyon's office test, standard office use-cases were evaluated. The office tests show a solid increase in performance for Strix Halo, but not as significant as the previous entries.

UL Procyon Office Suite (Higher is Better)
Word
Excel
PowerPoint
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @120W)
9856
8022
9333
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @85W)
9404
7884
9255
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @54W)
9027
7399
9027
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
7921
6653
7894
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
6569
6350
7075
Geekom A9 MAX (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
6560
6340
7071

Lastly, we have the WinRAR benchmark test. Here, the CPU combined with fast LPDDR5x-8000 memory provides a superb uplift in performance.

Winrar 7.13 (Higher is Better)
Speed (KB/s)
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @120W)
27360
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @85W)
23772
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @54W)
25672
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
19333
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
15787
Geekom A9 MAX (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
15502

GMKtec EVO X2 - AI Synthetic Performance

Next up, we have our first AI benchmarks for the latest Intel and AMD CPUs. First up, we have the Geekbench AI benchmark numbers, which are as follows:

Geekbench AI "ONNX" CPU (Higher is Better)
Single Precision
Half Precision
Quantized Score
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @1120W)
6907
2471
11438
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
3870
1525
6228
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
3220
1490
6140
Geekom A9 MAX (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
3224
1488
6135
Geekbench AI "ONNX" DirectML (Higher is Better)
Single Precision
Half Precision
Quantized Score
0
7000
14000
21000
28000
35000
42000
0
7000
14000
21000
28000
35000
42000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @120W)
26480
36101
20661
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
7674
9783
5288
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
7660
10650
5890
Geekom A9 MAX (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
7655
10642
5881

For UL Procyon, we again see Intel's latest CPUs and its various AI accelerators, such as the NPU and the GPU, offering better performance capabilities than the Ryzen AI offerings.

UL Procyon AI Text Generation (Higher is Better)
Score
Average TTFT (Seconds)
Average OTS (Tokens/s)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @120W)
894
2.57
45.12
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
619
1.44
11.87
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
265
13.07
19.39
Geekom A9 MAX (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
13.09
19.45
UL Procyon AI Image Generation "Stable Diffusion 1.5 FP16" (Lower is Better)
Overall Score
Generation Speed (s/image)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @120W/GPU)
663
56.491
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H/GPU)
47
17.002
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370/GPU)
166
34.143
Geekom A9 MAX (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
168
35.718

With 126 TOPs of AI compute at its disposal, the GPU and NPU combination provides strong AI numbers. Plus, we did mess around with some local chatbots and Amuse, and the dedicated memory option for the GPU enables the EVO X2 as a solid Mini AI Workstation.

GMKtec EVO X2 Mini PC - GPU Synthetic Performance

Now we are going to look at the GPU performance, and before we present to you the gaming numbers, we first have to see how the performance fares in synthetic benchmarks. For this purpose, we first want to outline the single-precision FLOPs each iGPU offers. Intel's Arc and AMD's Radeon series are based on entirely different architectures, and despite the FLOPS of the Radeon iGPU being higher, it doesn't necessarily mean that the Radeon iGPU will be faster. But with that said, the following is how the two chips compare:

Single Precision Flops "FP32" (Higher is Better)
GFLOPS
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S)
26959
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M)
7562
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M)
7446
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T)
4890

Strix Halo's Radeon 8060S iGPU with 40 RDNA 3.5 compute units offers almost 27 TFLOPs of FP32 compute, a 3.6x increase over the 12 RDNA 3.5 compute units featured in the Radeon 890M iGPU. Comparatively, that's 3.33x more cores.

In 3DMark Speed Way, the Radeon 8060S scores a 4x lead over the entry-level iGPUs, offering close to RTX 4060/RTX 5050 (discrete graphics cards) levels of RT performance.

3DMark Speed Way (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S)
2030
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M)
551
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M)
550
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T)
489

For 3DMark Steel Nomad, we get to see our first non-RT performance of these iGPUs. Once again, this is almost a 4x lead for the Radeon 8060S, almost matching the RTX 4060/RTX 5050 graphics cards.

3DMark Steel Nomad (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S)
2194
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T)
835
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M)
570
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M)
566

In 3DMark Port Royal, the Radeon 8060S is up to 3.5x faster than the entry-level iGPUs. Once again, very close to the RTX 4060/RTX 5050 graphics cards.

3DMark Port Royal (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S)
5861
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T)
1877
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M)
1699
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M)
1678

In 3DMark Time Spy, the Radeon 8060S is over 3.5x faster than the entry-level iGPUs. The chip exceeds the performance offered by RTX 4060/RTX 5050 graphics cards.

3DMark Time Spy (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
Graphics Score
CPU Score
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S)
11148
11344
10157
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T)
4511
4112
11399
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M)
3578
3202
10984
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M)
3552
3200
10948

For Fire Strike, Intel offers great performance even on DX11 APIs, which is a good showcase, as many games still run DX11. The Radeon 8060S crushes the entry-level iGPUs and puts out 10-15% better performance than the RTX 4060/RTX 5050 graphics cards.

3DMark Fire Strike (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
Graphics Score
Physics Score
0
7000
14000
21000
28000
35000
42000
0
7000
14000
21000
28000
35000
42000
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S)
26851
30497
32166
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T)
8660
9011
29501
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M)
7802
8370
24666
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M)
7784
8356
24649

Lastly, we have 3DMark Night Raid, where the Radeon 8060S manages to come close to even the flagship RTX 5090 Blackwell (Mobile) GPU.

3DMark Night Raid (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
Graphics Score
CPU Score
0
21095
42190
63285
84380
105475
126570
0
21095
42190
63285
84380
105475
126570
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S)
68887
126570
19229
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T)
33172
41110
16738
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M)
29303
37224
13004
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M)
29300
37220
13001

GMKtec EVO X2 Mini PC - HD Gaming Performance

With the synthetic performance out of the way, we can start taking a look at pure gaming numbers, and we start off our testing spree with Cyberpunk 2077 running at Medium Preset at 1080p with Balanced XeSS/FSR upscaling.

Cyberpunk 2077 (1080p, Medium Preset)
Average FPS (Balanced Upscaling)
Average FPS (Balanced FSR Frame-Gen)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @120W)
141.59
214.83
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @85W)
123.58
186.60
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @54W)
111.92
166.7
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M @70W)
59.72
90.80
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M @70W)
58.55
88.12
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T @70W)
58.12
78.05

In Forza Horizon 5, we only ran the game using Quality Upscaling at the Medium Preset at 1080p.

Forza Horizon 5 (1080p, Medium, Quality Upscaling)
Average FPS
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @120W)
196
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @85W)
177
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @54W)
156
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
95
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
93
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T XeSS @70W)
88

In F1 24, we used the High Preset at 1080p.

F1 24 (1080p, High Preset)
Average FPS (Balanced Upscaling)
Average FPS (Balanced Frame-Gen)
0
70
140
210
280
350
420
0
70
140
210
280
350
420
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @120W)
213
382
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @85W)
189
363
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @54W)
169
305
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
74
110
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
72
107
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T XeSS @70W)
69
98

In Horizon Zero Dawn at the "Favor Quality" preset, we used the FSR 2 upscaling set to Balanced.

Horizon Zero Dawn (1080p, Favor Quality, FSR2 On)
Average FPS
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @120W)
151
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @85W)
146
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @54W)
131
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
70
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
68
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T XeSS @70W)
63

Metro Exodus also runs great, offering up to 101 FPS using the High Preset and RT set to Normal at 1080p.

Metro Exodus (1080p, High Preset, RT Normal)
Average FPS
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @120W)
101
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @85W)
79.52
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @54W)
63.18
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T XeSS @70W)
44.83
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
33.25
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
31.88

Lastly, we have The Callisto Protocol, which runs flawlessly at the provided settings.

The Callisto Protocol (1080p, Medium, FSR2 On)
Average FPS
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @120W)
121.39
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @85W)
105.85
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @54W)
96.54
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
55.97
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
53.82
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T XeSS @70W)
50.08

Borderlands 4 is a heavy game to run, but the Radeon 8060S can manage a solid 60 FPS at 1080p High using Quality upscaling (FSR3) while enabling frame-gen nets you over 100 FPS. The entry-level iGPUs barely manage 30 FPS even with frame-gen enabled at the same settings.

Borderlands 4 (1080p, High)
Average FPS (Quality Upscaling)
Average FPS (Quality Frame-Gen)
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @120W)
63.63
118.68
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @85W)
60.12
113.02
GMKtec EVO X2 (Radeon 8060S @54W)
56.48
105.66
Beelink SER9 (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
16.11
29.30
Geekom A9 MAX (Radeon 890M FSR @70W)
16.05
29.11
GMKtec EVO T1 (Arc 140T XeSS @70W)
15.88
28.65

Lastly, we chose to see how the Radeon 8060S performs when we crank up the settings to the max in each of the tested titles at 1080p. Looking at the number, we can see superb performance, which should be enough to play the same games at 1440p and even 4K using a mix of high settings, upscaling, and frame-gen.

High Fidelity Gaming on Ryzen AI MAX+ 395
120W
85W
54W
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
Cyberpunk 2077 (High/1080p/Quality/Frame-Gen)
89.0
81.4
72.10
Cyberpunk 2077 (High/1080p/Quality/ No Frame-Gen)
59.85
55.22
46.11
F1 24 (Ultra High/1080p/Quality/ Frame-Gen)
172
163
138
Forza Horizon 5 (Ultra/1080p/Quality/ No Frame-Gen)
126
116
103
Callisto Protocol (Ultra/1080//Quality)
121.39
105.8
95.83
Horizon Zero Dawn (Ultimate/1080p/Quality)
135
131
115
Metro Exodus EE (Extreme/1080p/Quality)
41.59
39.21
33.79

GMKtec EVO X2 Mini PC - Power & Thermals

Next, we can see the power consumption of the latest Mini PCs.

Package Power (Lower is Better)
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @ 120W)
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @ 85W)
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @ 54W)
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
Geekom A9 Max (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
Idle
7
6
6
7
6
5
Gaming
112
76
45
70
70
70
Peak
120
85
54
75
70
70
Peak Rating
140
120
100
150
92
90

Following thermals, we have temperatures:

Temperatures
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @ 120W)
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @ 85W)
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @ 54W)
GMKtec EVO T1 (Core Ultra 9 285H @70W)
Beelink SER9 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
Geekom A9 Max (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 @70W)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Idle
40
40
42
45
42
40
Gaming
81
68
49
77
70
66
Peak
86
73
59
97
85
80

The 120W profile can make the EVO X2 a bit toasty, working at 85C+ temps, but the 85W and 54W profiles keep it in a more stable range. Following is the clock operation at each of the given TDP modes:

Minimum Assured Clock Speed (10 mins Burn-In)
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @ 120W)
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @ 85W)
GMKtec EVO X2 (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @ 54W)
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Average
4488.4
3970.0
3049.0
Peak
5152.3
5149.1
5147.6

Conclusion - Ryzen AI MAX+ Is The Game-Changer

The Future is Fusion, which used to be AMD's motto a decade ago when they first ventured into APUs. Back in the day, I used to believe that this Fusion was a reference to combining a powerful CPU with a high-end GPU, all on a single chip. The exascale APU patents from several years ago brought us closer to that dream, but it would take years of engineering and a solid framework to build a chip that offered the best of both worlds. Now in 2025, that chip is finally here in the form of Strix Halo or Ryzen AI MAX.

When AMD officially took the lid off Strix Halo earlier this year, I was excited to get my hands on one, as I've always been excited for new APUs. Strix Halo isn't just a regular APU or SoC; it combines the best of both worlds, bringing up to 16 Zen 5 cores together with a massive GPU with 40 compute units based on the latest RDNA 3.5 architecture. The chip also offers the latest IO capabilities, and these are the things that are the most exciting.

AMD Strix Halo Achieves Next-Level SoC Performance

The 16 Zen 5 cores offer tremendous productivity and multi-threaded performance. It might not be a 1-1 copy of the Ryzen 9 9950X, but it is strong at its given power budget. Then we have the Radeon 8060S iGPU, which is as mighty as you can expect. This iGPU crunches through all games we threw at it at 1080p, giving enough headroom for gamers to go the extra mile with 1440p or 2160p resolutions.

The memory subsystem of the Strix Halo SoC also makes it a potent solution for AI, handling chonkier LLMs with ease, with these chips dedicating up to 96 GB to the GPU alone. This also works in favor of games where you're no longer restricted to measly 8 GB dedicated memory; instead, you can select a pool size from 512 MB, up to 96 MB, and run games perfectly even at higher resolutions. The LPDDR5X-8000 256-bit config also provides a decent amount of bandwidth, but I can already see where AMD is going to go next.

For gaming, we have the following recommendation for Strix Halo users:

  • 1080p AAA Gaming: Playable With Max Settings (Some with Upscaling set to Quality Mode)
  • 1440p AAA Gaming: Playable With High Settings (Some with Upscaling+Frame-Gen set to Quality Mode)
  • 2160p AAA Gaming: Playable With Med/High Settings (Upscaling Set To Quality/Balanced With Frame-Gen)

We can expect similar compute units based on newer architectures, but coupled with better memory sub-systems such as LPDDR6, and the possible inclusion of a larger dedicated cache, to further mitigate the GPU's bandwidth requirements. AMD has got hold of the packaging expertise required to create a Halo-class SoC; now it's time for them to innovate and accelerate their future.

GMKtec's EVO X2 Is Massively Powerful, Tidy, & Offers Solid IO Given Its Small Size

While the AMD Strix Halo is insanely good, we also have a lot of positive things to say about the EVO X2 from GMKtec. It's small, it's fast, and it has a lot of useful and modern IO. You get two USB4 ports, a 2.5GbE LAN port, Wi-Fi 7+BT5.4 wireless capabilities, and other essentials, making it enough for the majority of PC users.

The chassis itself is quite a looker, with its RGB illumination, a dual-fan cooler for the Strix Halo SoC, and another dedicated fan for the SSDs. As for the upgradability, the two SSD slots can be equipped with up to 4 TB each, but the memory, unfortunately, is soldered to the motherboard. So you have to pre-select a configuration which comes in 64 GB, 96 GB, and 128 GB flavors.

Now for thermals and power, the BIOS lets you configure between the three modes easily, and there's also a performance switch button which you can access from the front. I'd say the 85W is correctly labeled as Balanced as it doesn't offset you with a huge performance loss and keeps you in proximity with the Performance 120W mode. The 54W mode is also great for low-power workloads, and even with a low TDP, the raw specs for the Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 still manage to beat 70-80W configured standard Strix APUs.

Thermals are on the hotter side with the temps exceeding 85 °C at the full performance mode of 120W and even 75 °C with the 85W mode. Only the 54W mode yields lower than 70 °C temps. The 120W and 85W TDP modes also make the fan spin much faster, so much so that you can hear it going into supersonic mode, but that's a necessity since otherwise, you'll remain thermally throttled with the clocks dropping down to the 3 GHz level.

As for pricing, the GMKtec EVO X2 64 GB is currently listed for $1499 US, which is reasonable given that laptops with the same specs and AI MAX+ 395 are over $2000 US. Now, you can build yourself a fantastic PC for $1500 US, such as a 5060 Ti or 9060 XT with a 9800X3D, 32 GB of memory, 1 TB SSD, and a 700W PSU, but that's not the point of the EVO X2. It's small, it's a singular chip solution, and it can dedicate large pools of memory to the GPU, making it a solid mini AI workstation or a gaming machine.

So with the Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 "Strix Halo" SoC, AMD delivers on the "Future is Fusion" promise, making the world's most powerful SoC with its Zen 5 CPU and RDNA 3.5 GPU architecture. It's a fantastic chip for all your AI, Gaming, and Productivity needs, and machines such as the GMKtec EVO X2 showcase us a vibrant future for such Halo SoCs.

Things we liked/disliked about the GMKtec EVO X2 Mini PC:

  • +16 Full-Fat Zen 5 Cores in dual CCX chiplets offering strong productivity performance
  • +Radeon 8060S with 40 Compute Units makes Strix Halo the fastest SoC for gaming & AI
  • +Incredibly Efficient SoC With chiplet architecture & TSMC 4nm process
  • +Fast LPDDR5X-8000 memory with up to 128 GB capacities
  • +Mini PC Form Factor With good IO capabilities (WIFI7, USB4, etc)
  • +Ability to dedicate large pools of memory to the GPU for AI & Gaming
  • +Fantastic gaming performance with iGPU, solid at 1080p, good-enough for 1440p, doable at 4K
  • +Triple-Fan cooling
  • -Can get very hot 85C+ under load
  • -Noise from fans is a bit annoying
  • -BIOS can include more tuning options

The EVO X2 can be bought from the following links (Official Page):

You can find additional information about our hardware review process and ethics policy here.

Button