cover
Hardware

ASUS Zenbook A14 “Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme” Laptop Review – Shockingly Light-Weight With A Super-Fast CPU

Hassan Mujtaba

Last year, Qualcomm introduced its Snapdragon X2 Elite SoCs. These SoCs promised some big uplifts over the competition and the first-generation X Elite chips. With the first laptops rolling out in the market now, we decided to reach out to Qualcomm and ASUS to send us a 14" design to see if the laptop holds up to those claims.

ASUS Zenbook A14 Laptop - Specifications At A Glance

In terms of specifications, the ASUS Zenbook A14 is equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme SoC. This is the flagship processor within the Snapdragon X2 lineup, which is designed to offer strong performance features, faster NPU/GPU capabilities, and a better Arm experience on Windows OS. The latest chip is made on TSMC's N3 process node and features over 31 billion transistors in a chip that measures roughly 220mm2.

Related Story Qualcomm Pitches Snapdragon C as the Antidote to Rising Laptop Costs, Promising All-Day Battery & AI at $300

The laptop was configured with the Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme "X2E88100", which features 18 cores & 18 threads. There are 12 performance-optimized cores, with six of them arranged in two clusters and one E-Core cluster comprising six cores. A single P-Core can boost up to 4.70 GHz, and the maximum boost has been listed at 4.05 GHz for the Prime Cores and 3.57 GHz for the Performance cores.

The chip features a total of 44 MB of L2 cache arranged in 32 MB (16 MB each) for the Prime Core clusters and 12 MB for the Performance Core cluster. The total onboard cache on the chip is 53 MB.

For the iGPU, Qualcomm is using its latest Adreno X2-90 GPU, which features 2048 ALUs and clocks in at up to 1.70 GHz. The chip has access to 21 MB of on-chip memory and follows the unified memory approach, as it has access to the onboard memory for faster bandwidth. Qualcomm has done some fine-tuning on the GPU side after its first-generation outing, offering full DirectX 12.2 and OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.4 support, & more.

On the NPU side, the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite series is equipped with the latest Hexagon NPU, which offers a peak TOPS of 80 and supports all the latest AI frameworks. This is the fastest NPU in terms of AI TOPS in the market right now.

Snapdragon X2 EliteCoresClocksCacheGPU ClockGPUNPUMemoryBandwidth
X2E-96-10018Up to 5.0 GHz53 MBUp to 1.85 GHzX2-9080 TOPSLPDDR5xUp to 228 GB/s
X2E-94-10018Up to 4.7 GHz53 MBUp to 1.85 GHzX2-9080 TOPSLPDDR5xUp to 228 GB/s
X2E-90-10018Up to 5.0 GHz53 MBUp to 1.70 GHzX2-9085 TOPSLPDDR5xUp to 152 GB/s
X2E-88-10018Up to 4.7 GHz53 MBUp to 1.70 GHzX2-9080 TOPSLPDDR5xUp to 152 GB/s
X2E-84-10012Up to 4.7 GHz34 MBUp to 1.70 GHzX2-8585 TOPSLPDDR5xUp to 152 GB/s
X2E-80-10012Up to 4.7 GHz34 MBUp to 1.70 GHzX2-8580 TOPSLPDDR5xUp to 152 GB/s
X2E-78-10012Up to 4.0 GHz34 MBUp to 1.35 GHzX2-8580 TOPSLPDDR5xUp to 152 GB/s

With the specs of the main SoC covered, let's talk about the rest of the specifications. First, we have the memory, which comes in the form of 16 GB of LPDDR5x. The laptop comes pre-configured and pre-soldered in 16 GB and up to 32 GB options.

The LPDDR5x modules on the Zenbook A14 operate at 9533 MT/s across a 128-bit-wide bus interface. The higher-end configurations feature a 192-bit-wide interface. The A14 configuration supplements the system with up to 152 GB/s of bandwidth.

Our review unit was equipped with a 512 PCIe Gen4 SSD. The laptop comes with two NVMe 2280 M.2 slots. It can be pre-configured with 512 GB or up to 1 TB of storage.

IO includes two Thunderbolt 4 USB Type-C (PD+DP2.1) ports, a USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A port, an HDMI 2.1 output, and a headphone/mic combo port. It also comes with an FHD camera with IR functions, a backlit keyboard with chiclet design and 1.3mm key-travel, a precision touchpad with multi-gesture support, & WIFI7+BT5.4 capabilities.

The laptop comes in two 14" screen options: a WUXGA OLED (1920x1200) panel with 400 nits of brightness (600 HDR), a 60Hz refresh rate, and a higher-end 2.8K OLED panel, 400 nits of brightness (1100 HDR), and up to a 120Hz refresh rate. Our unit was equipped with the standard WUXGA design. There's a built-in array microphone and speaker with Smart Amp technology.

The laptop is very compact and lightweight, featuring a 1.34 cm thin design and weighing roughly 0.99 kg or 2.18lbs. The battery is a 70Whr Polymer design, which is charged by a 100W Type-C power adapter.

ASUS Zenbook A14 Laptop - CPU Performance

We start by comparing the 3DMark CPU Profile tests. The Snapdragon X2 Elite XE2-88100 sits between the Panther Lake and Arrow Lake lineup with decent multi-threading figures, but its single-core results fall significantly behind even the Lunar Lake SoCs.

3DMark CPU Profile (Higher is Better)
Max Threads
16 Threads
8 Threads
4 Threads
2 Threads
1 Thread
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
10449
10242
6492
4327
2306
1207
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395)
10385
8553
7360
4403
2267
1148
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Snapdragon X2E-88100)
9201
8794
5343
3102
1671
862
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
8396
8478
6576
4236
2140
1061
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
6348
6149
5276
3664
2202
1157
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
5751
5736
5756
3708
2085
1139

While the read memory bandwidth of Snapdragon X2 Elite is on par with others in the 14" camp, the Write and Copy bandwidth is less than half of that. This could be due to the 128-bit LP5X interface vs Snapdragon's full 192-bit interface on the higher-end SoCs.

AIDA64 Cache & Memory Benchmark "Memory* Cache MB/s" (Higher is Better)
Read
Write
Copy
0
35250
70500
105750
141000
176250
211500
0
35250
70500
105750
141000
176250
211500
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395)
120440
211500
152050
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Snapdragon X2E-88100)
121190
50966
67997
Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
118780
131990
125950
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
90437
102002
82305
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
87465
114041
104473
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
78486
75644
86896

For Blender, the Snapdragon X2 Elite is over 30% faster than Intel's Panther Lake in the same 14" form factor.

Blender "Samples Per Minute"  (Higher is Better)
monster
junkshop
classroom
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395)
185.4
129.2
97.0
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Snapdragon X2E-88100)
182.2
122.2
82.2
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
130.4
88.92
62.55
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
106
65.6
42.4
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
90
65.9
44.2
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
63
39.4
28.2

In CPU-Z, the Snapdragon X2 Elite offers the fastest single and multi-core performance, which is very impressive.

CPU-z 2.13.0 (Higher is Better)
Single-Core
Multi-Core
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Snapdragon X2E-88100)
942.1
12325
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395)
779.5
11901.6
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
776.6
9680
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
829.3
9336
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
800.2
6300
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
741.4
4959

For Cinebench, we once again see the fastest single-core and multi-core performance on Qualcomm's Snapdragon platform. The chip is 15% faster than Panther Lake and over 30% faster than AMD's Zen 5 architectures in single-core. The multi-core lead extends to 10% versus Intel's latest Panther Lake CPUs.

Cinebench 2024 (Higher is Better)
Single-Core
Multi-Core
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Snapdragon X2E-88100)
150
1452
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395)
110
1449
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
130
1324
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
123
928
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
113
832
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
119
591

In Geekbench 6, the Snapdragon X2 Elite offers an 11-12% uplift versus AMD's and Intel's top SoCs in multi-core tests. And it's even better in single-core with a 25% lead over Intel and a 31% lead over the AMD SoCs.

Geekbench 6 (Higher is Better)
Single-Core
Multi-Core
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Snapdragon X2E-88100)
3752
19860
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
3011
17819
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395)
2867
17810
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
2949
16032
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
2820
12693
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
2616
10805

In Procyon Office, the Zenbook A14 is right there with the Zenbook Duo with Intel's Core Ultra X9 388H SoC.

UL Procyon Office Suite (Higher is Better)
Word
Excel
PowerPoint
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
9526
7151
7248
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395)
9110
7566
7438
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Snapdragon X2E-88100)
8963
7333
7001
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
8131
6706
6730
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
7807
6459
7699
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
6198
6103
6448

WinRAR's compression tests see the Snapdragon X2 Elite on the A14 sitting between the Intel 285H and the Intel 258V.

Winrar 7.01 (Higher is Better)
Speed (KB/s)
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395)
26387
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
20370
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
17515
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
17112
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
15911

ASUS Zenbook A14 Laptop - AI Synthetic Performance

Next up, we have our AI benchmarks for the latest Intel, AMD, and Qualcomm CPUs. First up, we have the Geekbench AI benchmarks, where the Snapdragon X2 Elite takes the last spot in the single-precision tests in the ONNX API, but the lead picks up in half-precision and quantized scores. The same is the case in the QNN workloads, but here, the Half-Precision and Quantized scores exceed today's top-tier SoCs, demonstrating Qualcomm's Hexagon NPU's true capabilities.

Geekbench AI "ONNX" CPU (Higher is Better)
Single Precision
Half Precision
Quantized Score
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395)
5531
2025
9781
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
4900
1872
9214
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
3865
1525
6228
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
3216
1483
6144
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
2338
1223
4695
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Snapdragon X2E-88100)
2129
3566
7319
Geekbench AI "ONNX" DirectML (Higher is Better)
Single Precision
Half Precision
Quantized Score
0
15000
30000
45000
60000
75000
90000
0
15000
30000
45000
60000
75000
90000
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395)
20378
28156
17270
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
11871
20120
7879
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
7668
9781
5280
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
7618
14097
5332
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
6799
9297
5380

For UL Procyon, we see the performance matching Intel's Lunar Lake chips, which are rated at around 48 TOPS.

UL Procyon AI Suite With NPU "Integer Precision" (Higher is Better)
Score
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H/GPU)
2475
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H/NPU)
2211
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Snapdragon X2E-88100)
1856
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395/NPU)
1773
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V/NPU)
1751
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365/NPU)
1732
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V/GPU)
1417
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H/GPU)
1177
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H/NPU)
684

ASUS Zenbook A14 Laptop - GPU Synthetic Performance

Now we are going to look at the GPU performance, and before we present to you the gaming numbers, we first have to see how the performance fares in synthetic benchmarks. For this purpose, we first want to outline the synthetic performance.

In 3DMark Speed Way, a purely raytracing benchmark, we see the Adreno X2-90 GPU last in the list.

3DMark Speed Way (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Radeon 8060S)
1893
ASUS Zenbook Duo (Arc B390)
1021
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
896
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
511
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
479
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Adreno X2-90)
361

For 3DMark Steel Nomad, the X2-90 ends up faster than Intel's Xe2-based iGPUs, but the new Xe3 chips are significantly faster.

3DMark Steel Nomad (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Radeon 8060S)
1926
ASUS Zenbook Duo (Arc B390)
1652
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Adreno X2-90)
1095
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
827
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
823
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
524

In 3DMark Port Royal, the chip is on par with AMD's Radeon 880M.

3DMark Port Royal (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Radeon 8060S)
5184
ASUS Zenbook Duo (Arc B390)
4066
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
2146
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
1843
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Adreno X2-90)
1525
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
1515

In 3DMark Time Spy, the iGPU is only faster than the Radeon 880M, but the newer SoCs from AMD & Intel are much ahead.

3DMark Time Spy (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
Graphics Score
CPU Score
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Radeon 8060S)
9561
9510
9861
ASUS Zenbook Duo (Arc B390)
7730
7099
15577
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
4396
4112
7238
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
4447
4047
10136
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Adreno X2-90)
4046
3625
11868
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
3297
2965
9024

For Fire Strike, Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite is faster than Intel's Xe2 iGPUs but much slower than the new Xe3 iGPUs.

3DMark Fire Strike (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
Graphics Score
Physics Score
0
7000
14000
21000
28000
35000
42000
0
7000
14000
21000
28000
35000
42000
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Radeon 8060S)
22628
25718
31379
ASUS Zenbook Duo (Arc B390)
14453
17221
33284
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Adreno X2-90)
9404
9895
24009
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
9153
10138
22169
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
8315
8902
27466
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
7322
7866
23949

Lastly, we have 3DMark Night Raid, where the iGPU was ahead of Xe2 and RDNA 3.5 iGPUs on the mainstream SoCs. The CPU score is quite good here.

3DMark Night Raid (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
Graphics Score
CPU Score
0
16667
33334
50001
66668
83335
100002
0
16667
33334
50001
66668
83335
100002
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Radeon 8060S)
57235
97665
17107
ASUS Zenbook Duo (Arc B390)
49369
76266
16465
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
44391
56173
20284
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
35222
46927
14595
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
32715
40055
16050

ASUS Zenbook A14 Laptop - HD Gaming Performance

With the synthetic performance out of the way, we can start taking a look at pure gaming numbers, and we start off our testing spree with Cyberpunk 2077 running at Medium Preset at 1200P. We used FSR 3.1 upscaling and Frame-Gen, and the performance was decent enough to get us in the 50-80 FPS range.

Cyberpunk 2077 (1200P, Medium Preset)
Average FPS (Balanced Upscaling)
Average FPS (Balanced Frame-Gen)
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Radeon 8060S)
112.52
199.25
ASUS Zenbook Duo (Arc B390)
93.37
151.59
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V XeSS)
55.64
79.29
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Adreno X2-90)
53.11
76.55
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T XeSS)
44.13
63.50
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M FSR)
40.15
59.93

In Forza Horizon 5, we ran the game using Quality Upscaling at the Medium Preset at 1200P, and the Adreno X2-90 delivered 37 FPS on average. The experience wasn't the smoothest, and we did experience many artifacts and stutters.

Forza Horizon 5 (1200p, Medium, Quality Upscaling)
Average FPS
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Radeon 8060S)
148
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Arc B390 XeSS)
106
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T XeSS)
62
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V XeSS)
61
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M FSR)
56
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Adreno X2-90 XeSS)
37

In Horizon Zero Dawn at the "Favor Quality" preset, we used the FSR 2 upscaling set to Balanced. Here, the Adreno X2-90 GPU matched the Radeon 880M.

Horizon Zero Dawn (1200p, Favor Quality, FSR2 On)
Average FPS
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Radeon 8060S)
130
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Arc B390)
90
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Adreno X2-90)
56
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
56
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
51
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V XeSS)
46

The Radeon 8060S and the Arc B390 are the only integrated SoC solutions that can deliver a 60 FPS range in Metro Exodus with RT enabled, as the other iGPUs are stuck in the 20-30 FPS range.

Metro Exodus (1080p, High Preset, RT Normal)
Average FPS
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Arc B390)
61.12
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Radeon 8060S)
59.41
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
30.47
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
28.30
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Adreno X2-90)
28.27
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
22.19

Lastly, we have The Callisto Protocol, where the Adreno X2-90 was on par with the Radeon 880M once again.

The Callisto Protocol (1200p, Medium, FSR2 On)
Average FPS
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Radeon 8060S)
89.26
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Arc B390)
71.18
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
43.4
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Adreno X2-90)
38.26
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
37.5
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
34.6

HP Zbook Ultra G1a Laptop - Thermals, Power & Battery

A major factor of today's laptops is their power consumption, and in that regard, the ASUS Zenbook A14's Snapdragon X2 Elite chip has a default TDP of 30-35W, which goes up to 65W when plugged in.

While the peak power of both laptops was seen over 80W, the gaming power was slightly different. The X2 Elite laptop was close to 38-45W when plugged in while gaming. As for application power, this rose to 50W and casually jumped to 65W. Only certain bursts took power over 80W.

Power Ratings & Consumption
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395)
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Snapdragon X2 Elite 18)
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
OOB TDP
60
45
35
28
30
17
PL1 Peak
70
64
64
48
35
37
Idle Power
4.83
3.11
2.88
3.19
7.1
2.28
Media Playback
8.9
5.66
9
6
9.4
4.5
Gaming Power
45
39
40
32
44
32
Peak Power
70
69
73
71
83
42

The Zenbook A14 is a compact and lightweight machine. That means it's going to get a little bit toastier than its 16-inch sibling. We saw the temperatures climb up to 90C when running heavier applications, but in lighter workloads, the temperatures were around 45-55C. Gaming saw the temps in the 60-70C range. The good thing is that the laptop was very silent even under full load, making it a truly potent machine for those who don't want intrusive machines to work on.

Temperatures
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395)
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Snapdragon X2 Elite 18)
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Idle
41
42
38
42
42
44
Gaming
61
72
66
60
68
70
Peak
81
96
97
70
93
91

The A14 comes with a 70Whr battery, but still manages to deliver some nice battery times.

Battery Capacity
Whr
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
ASUS Zenbook Duo (Core Ultra X9 388H)
99
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
99
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
82
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395)
74.5
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
72
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Snapdragon X2 Elite)
70
Battery Tests
UL Office Productivity (Battery Minutes)
Gaming Performance (Battery Minutes)
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
ASUS Zenbook Duo (Core Ultra X9 388H)
1378
305
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
1311
284
ASUS Zenbook A14 (Snapdragon X2 Elite)
1229
269
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
1224
258
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
752
187
HP Zbook Ultra G1a (Ryzen AI MAX+ 395)
638
110

Conclusion - Ultra-Light With Leading CPU Performance

This was my first taste of the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite, and well, there are more good things to say about this SoC lineup, and products such as the ASUS Zenbook A14.

Premium Design, Thin & Light Masterpiece

First and foremost, the design. This is one of the lightest 14" laptops I have ever used. The Zenbook S14 series was super light, featuring Intel's Lunar Lake SoCs. The A14 brings a whole new level of performance to this form factor with the X2 Elite series. The champagne gold color choice gives it a premium look, and the overall material choices are great, which is a given due to this laptop being part of the Zenbook segment. The backlit keyboard and the large touchpad were phenomenal, and the speakers do pack a punch even on this compact design.

Having no touch pad, and the standard 1920x1200 screen at 60Hz takes away some of the premium feel that the other laptops in our list have, but those also cost more. You can get a nicer OLED version with a higher refresh rate by paying extra, but I think the touch screen is something you can live without. This is also a super thin laptop. ASUS gives you dual USB4 ports, a USB Type-C port, and HDMI, more than what competitors provide on a similar form factor.

Performance & Battery

Now for performance. The CPU is shockingly fast, like I was expecting 18 cores to be rock solid, but Arm on Windows with performance exceeding the Panther Lake and Strix Halo chips took me by surprise. The CPU also runs efficiently; sure, it runs hotter given the limited cooling space the laptop has to work with, but the perf/w is definitely good, and both multi/single core numbers see a decent bump over the rivals.

The GPU is decent. Qualcomm has done some homework and made sure more games run and offer a very optimized experience. With performance matching the Radeon 880M and Intel Xe2 architectures, it looks like Qualcomm is on the right track, but they have to work really hard if they want to keep up with the integrated graphics performance that their competitors are offering on the latest chips. Lastly, we've the NPU performance. We saw the NPU doing some good work, but there are still a lot of applications that would force the GPU over the Hexagon NPU for AI tasks.

The battery on the A14 was another positive thing to see. We've already seen Arm SoCs doing well in offering longer battery times than x86 offerings, but the x86 crowd is now accelerating things rapidly. Most users can expect 20-24 hours out of this laptop for everyday use cases. You'll even be left with 10-20% battery by the end of the day, and the drainage time is very low. You can charge the laptop to 100%, leave it for a few days in standby mode, and still have over 90% battery.

Good Value

The 16 GB Memory and 512 GB SSD configuration is currently being sold at $1099 US, which is a reasonable price given the capabilities this laptop packs. I found the A14 to be a strong laptop for everyday users who want a thin, light, and efficient machine, offering a longer battery life, premium looks and feels, and most importantly, a CPU that is super fast. We look forward to seeing more optimizations made for the GPU and NPU in the future.

You can find additional information about our hardware review process and ethics policy here.

Hassan Mujtaba Photo

About the author: A Software Engineer by training and a PC enthusiast by passion, Hassan Mujtaba serves as Wccftech's Senior Editor for hardware section. With years of experience in the industry, he specializes in deep-dive technical analysis of next-generation CPU and GPU architectures, motherboards, and cooling solutions. His work involves not only breaking news on upcoming technologies but also extensive hands-on reviews and benchmarking.

Follow Wccftech on Google to get more of our news coverage in your feeds.

Button