Intel Core Ultra 7 366H Leaked iGPU Geekbench Benchmark Reveals 26% Higher Score Vs Radeon 840M

Dec 3, 2025 at 07:23am EST
Intel logo beside a futuristic processor design on a circuit board.

One more Panther Lake SKU got benchmarked on Geekbench, but this one has only four GPU cores. The iGPU performs on par with entry-level GPUs, and here's how it did against its rivals.

Core Ultra 7 366H Spotted on Geekbench With Specs and iGPU Performance That Trades Blows With GTX 1050 Ti

Slowly, we are seeing more Intel Panther Lake CPUs in action. With the CPU series nearing its launch, several of its early engineering samples have been tested on various platforms. We mostly saw Core Ultra X7 SKUs being benchmarked, which boast 12 Xe3 Cores, but since Panther Lake will also have slower Core Ultra 7 variants, here is one, which offers 4 Xe3 Core-based iGPU.

Related Story Lip-Bu Tan Nearly Walked Away From Semiconductors, But One Plea to ‘Save Intel’ Pulled Him Back as CEO, Now Hiring Top CPU/GPU Architects

On Geekbench, its specs have been leaked, and we can see that it is a 16-core CPU, as was reported previously. The core configuration will be 4x Performance + 8x Efficient + 4x LP-E cores. The base clock is 2.00 GHz, which is correct, but unlike what is visible on the Geekbench result page, the CPU can reportedly boost up to 4.8 GHz. The L3 cache is 18 MB, which is also correct according to earlier leaks.

As for the iGPU, it is expected that this SKU will boast 4x GPU cores based on the Xe3 architecture and even though the CPU itself is a competitor to the Ryzen 7 mobile series, the iGPU can't be compared directly to the Radeon 860M. That said, for the sake of comparison, we will include the benchmarks of both the Radeon 860M and the Radeon 840M present on the Ryzen AI 5 340 APU.

Core Ultra 7 366H vs Competitors in Geekbench Vulkan Test
Scores
0
7000
14000
21000
28000
35000
42000
0
7000
14000
21000
28000
35000
42000
Radeon 860M
37552
Ultra 7 366H iGPU (4x Xe3 Cores)
22813
GTX 1050 ti (mobile)
21937
Radeon 840M
18060

The Ultra 7 366H iGPU scored 22,813 points in the Geekbench Vulkan test, which is slightly higher than the GTX 1050 Ti. Compared to the 4-Core Radeon 840M, it's 26% higher, but when compared to the 8-Core Radeon 860M, it's nearly 40% slower. This is expected since the CPU is aimed at the mainstream laptop segment, and isn't a direct competitor to powerful iGPUs available on Strix Point or Ryzen AI 7 series Krackan Point.

Panther Lake SKUs with 10 or 12 Xe3 GPU cores have already shown nearly RTX 3050-equivalent performance, and much higher cores than Radeon 890M in tests like 3DMark Time Spy. However, those SKUs are going to be much more expensive than the 8 or 12-core Panther Lake variants, which is why, for the budget segment, AMD Krackan Point looks unchallenged at the moment.

Intel Panther Lake-H and U lineup (Preliminary)

CPU ModelP-Cores (Cougar Cove)E-Cores (Darkmont)LP-E Cores (Skymont)CPU Clocks (Max)L3 CacheXe3 iGPU CoresiGPU ClockTDP
Core Ultra X9 388H4845.1 GHz18 MB12 (B390)TBD25W (65-80W Turbo)
Core Ultra X9 386H4844.9 GHz18 MB4TBD25W (65-80W Turbo)
Core Ultra X7 368H4845.0 GHz18 MB12 (B390)TBD25W (65-80W Turbo)
Core Ultra 7 366H4844.8 GHz18 MB4TBD25W (65-80W Turbo)
Core Ultra X7 358H4844.8 GHz18 MB12 (B390)2500 MHz25W (65-80W Turbo)
Core Ultra X7 356H4844.7 GHz18 MB4TBD25W (65-80W Turbo)
Core Ultra 5 338H4444.7 GHz18 MB10 (B370)TBD25W (65-80W Turbo)
Core Ultra 5 336H4444.6 GHz18 MB4TBD25W (65-80W Turbo)
Core Ultra 7 3654044.8 GHz12 MB4TBD25W (55W Turbo)
Core Ultra 7 3554044.7 GHz12 MB4TBD25W (55W Turbo)
Core Ultra 5 3354044.6 GHz12 MB4TBD25W (55W Turbo)
Core Ultra 5 3254044.5 GHz12 MB4TBD25W (55W Turbo)
Core Ultra 5 3322044.4 GHz12 MB2TBD25W (55W Turbo)
Core Ultra 5 3222044.4 GHz12 MB2TBD25W (55W Turbo)

News Sources: @BenchLeaks, Geekbench

About the author: Sarfraz Khan is a hardware reporter with a focus on PC components and the builder community. With years of experience writing about PC hardware and laptops, his work has been featured on several reputable technology publications. Sarfraz's hands-on experience is demonstrated through his first-person accounts of using and comparing different hardware configurations, providing practical and relatable insights for everyday users. His technical analysis is respected by peers in the enthusiast community and has been cited by specialized hardware sites such as Germany's Igor's Lab.

Follow Wccftech on Google to get more of our news coverage in your feeds.