Intel Core Ultra 3 205T Appears On PassMark For The First Time; Slighly Slower Than Ultra 5 225T In Multi-Threaded Test

Mar 18, 2026 at 06:40am EDT
Intel Arrow Lake CPUs See Significant Price Cuts Officially, Core Ultra 7 265KF Drops Down To $284 1

The slowest Arrow Lake processor was just benchmarked on PassMark, revealing its true single and multi-core prowess.

Core Ultra 3 205T Delivers 4% Higher Single-Core Than Core Ultra 5 225T, but Remains 10% Slower in the multi-threaded test in PassMark

The Arrow Lake lineup is vast, even though we see fewer SKUs in the market. Intel treats several SKUs as OEM units, which is why you won't see processors like Core Ultra 3 205T or Ultra 5 225T in the market. For the first time since the launch of the Intel Core Ultra 3 205T, we are now seeing the processor in action. Unlike the rest of the stack, the Ultra 3 205T appeared much later. As per the PassMark benchmark, the Ultra 3 205T was first seen this quarter, while the stronger Ultra 200T processors like Ultra 5 225T appeared in Q1 2025.

Related Story Intel Revives Raptor Lake Again With Core 7 230H And Core 5 205H, But Strips Out The Integrated Graphics Entirely

Nonetheless, we are seeing the Ultra 3 205T delivering a decent 4,432 points in a single-threaded test, which is roughly 4% higher than the Ultra 5 225T. Both SKUs have a different core configuration, with Ultra 5 225T bringing a 10-core configuration, while the Ultra 3 205T uses an 8-core config. So, you are seeing a lower score in the multi-threaded test. The Ultra 3 205T delivers 23,436 points vs 26,180 points by Ultra 5 225T. The gap is roughly 10%, which was expected, but keep in mind that the margin of error for the Ultra 3 205T is higher since only two samples have been registered till now.

PassMark scores tend to become more accurate as more samples are tested and registered on the platform. Still, the Ultra 3 205T is showing decent raw performance despite noticeably inferior specifications, including the cores, cache, and clocks. The Ultra 3 205 brings just 15 MB of L3 cache vs 20 MB on the Ultra 5 225T. It's also rated at the same 35W of TDP, making it a highly power-efficient chip for compact and ultra-lightweight devices.

While the PassMark benchmark page doesn't reveal the clocks, the individual benchmark pages reveal that the Ultra 3 205T could boost up to 4.68 GHz. It's also interesting to see that the improvement in scores is mostly due to the second benchmark, which delivered 25,949 points in the multi-threaded test, which is almost equivalent to the Ultra 5 225T's average score.

News Sources: PassMark, @x86deadandback

About the author: Sarfraz Khan is a hardware reporter with a focus on PC components and the builder community. With years of experience writing about PC hardware and laptops, his work has been featured on several reputable technology publications. Sarfraz's hands-on experience is demonstrated through his first-person accounts of using and comparing different hardware configurations, providing practical and relatable insights for everyday users. His technical analysis is respected by peers in the enthusiast community and has been cited by specialized hardware sites such as Germany's Igor's Lab.

Follow Wccftech on Google to get more of our news coverage in your feeds.

Deal of the Day