The past week, we got a closer look at the Xclipse 940’s specifications, but sadly, little information on how the Exynos 2400 GPU would perform. Luckily, just a few moments after reporting on Samsung’s upcoming SoC’s impressive multi-core performance, we came across some alleged scores of a Vulkan benchmark, where the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s Adreno 750 graphics processor is unable to keep pace with its future competitor.
Xclipse 940 only manages a seven percent performance lead over the Adreno 750, and other factors have yet to be considered
The Geekbench Vulkan’s supposed results were shared by Twitter user @OreXda, revealing a noteworthy result of the Exynos 2400’s Xclipse 940. Typically, the Snapdragon’s Adreno range performs better with each successive launch, according to past data, but on this occasion, we were greeted by a much-needed change. The figures were provided in collaboration with another Twitter user called Revegnus, showing that the Xclipse 940 obtains a score of 13858, while the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s Adreno 750 trails with a score of 12946, bringing a seven percent performance difference.
It is important to keep in mind that both chipsets are nowhere near their projected announcement dates, so it is likely that we will see some additional tweaks done, resulting in different scores a few months from now. While no screenshots of the scores were provided by @OreXda, the Xclipse 940 could be proof that Samsung and AMD went back to the drawing board in an attempt to find out what went wrong with the overhyped Xclipse 920 found in the Exynos 2200.
GeekBench Compute Score (Vulkan)
Exynos 2400 : 13858
Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 : 12946*Thanks for your help @Tech_Reve !
— Connor/코너/コナー (@OreXda) April 24, 2023
Looking at the scores right now, it is safe to assume that Samsung’s and AMD’s renewed licensing agreement bore some fruit. Then again, we do not know which version of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 was tested in the Geekbench Vulkan benchmark, as we reported about two versions with varying CPU configurations. It is possible the Adreno 750 is running at lower clock speeds and has different specifications, which may be a contributing factor to the scores we are seeing.
Our readers should still look at these results with a cloud of uncertainty because we have seen in the past that the Exynos 2200 would put up one heck of a fight, and we were sorely disappointed when the commercial launched. Similarly, we will check back on these Exynos 2400 scores and update you accordingly, so stay tuned.
News Source: @OreXda
Follow Wccftech on Google to get more of our news coverage in your feeds.
