Exynos 2400 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test Shows 2x Performance Gains Over The Exynos 2200, On Par With Apple’s A17 Pro

After the Galaxy S24 series was officially unveiled at Samsung’s first official event of the year, it did not take long for the company’s Exynos 2400 to be put through its paces since most consumers will make their purchase based on how well or poorly the SoC performs. In the latest 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test, Samsung’s top-end silicon puts on a positive first impression by obtaining twice the performance of its predecessor, the Exynos 2200, and matching the A17 Pro.

Exynos 2400 manages an average framerate of 24FPS in 3DMark’s Wild Life Extreme results

The scores were posted by Nguyen Phi Hung on X, showcasing how far Samsung has come with its newly launched Exynos 2400. The SoC scored 4,042 points in the benchmark, with the person stating that these results are twice as fast as what was achieved by the Exynos 2200, Samsung’s previous-generation chipset, which turned out to be a bitter disappointment. Fortunately, the company seemingly turned things around with the Exynos 2400, with the Wild Life Extreme results showing that the chipset is on par with Apple’s A17 Pro.

For those who do not know, 3DMark’s Wild Life Extreme Stress Test is designed to bring smartphone chips to their knees through a series of CPU and GPU-focused tests while monitoring how well the chipset can maintain its performance before high temperatures force it to throttle down. We believe there are two reasons why the Exynos 2400 performed as well as it did and how it is comparable to the A17 Pro.

See more

Exynos 2400's GPU performance
It's about on par with Apple A17 Pro, and 2x the performance of Exynos 2200! pic.twitter.com/sW58foIf6A

— Nguyen Phi Hung (@negativeonehero) January 18, 2024

One, Samsung’s entire Galaxy S24 series is equipped with a vapor chamber, not just the ‘Ultra’ version, so taming the temperatures of the Exynos 2400 will be much easier. In contrast, Apple has not used a vapor chamber or any other form of elaborate cooling on the iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 15 Pro Max, which would explain why the A17 Pro reaches its maximum temperature threshold so quickly.

Secondly, the new Exynos is mass produced on Samsung’s 4LPP+ process, which might be inferior compared to the TSMC’s N4P node, but it has improved power efficiency compared to the earlier iteration, leading to better results this time. Of course, this is not the only benchmark that will be used to monitor the Exynos 2400’s performance, and just because it holds its own in 3DMark Wild Life Extreme, does not mean it will maintain the same stance in another test. As always, we will provide updated results, so stay tuned.

News Source: Nguyen Phi Hung

Follow Wccftech on Google to get more of our news coverage in your feeds.