Apple has filed a federal lawsuit in Massachusetts against Apple Cinemas, a U.S. movie theatre chain, accusing them of trademark infringement and creating confusion among customers. The Cupertino giant alleges that the cinema is deliberately using the name "Apple" to gain from its global recognition and reputation, which the company has built over decades. From a general standpoint, it is not just about the word "Apple" for Apple, but about protecting the most valuable and recognizable brands in the world.
Apple is taking legal action to stop Apple Cinemas from using its name during nationwide expansion
A bit of history for those unfamiliar - Apple Cinemas was founded in 2013, and it initially operated mostly in the Northeastern United States without drawing too much attention from the iPhone maker. However, this changed recently when the cinema chain opened its first West Coast location in San Francisco and announced plans to expand aggressively to 100 theatres across the nation. The key point is that while some of these locations are in important metropolitan areas, others are close to Apple's retail stores and even in Apple's home turf in Silicon Valley.
Apple's lawsuit claims that the expansion increases the likelihood that consumers will assume some kind of partnership or affiliation between the two companies, something that the technology giant believes is entirely false. Apple has previously warned Apple Cinemas, and in October of 2024, the USPTO even denied the theatre chain's application for both "Apple Cinemas" and "ACX – Apple Cinematic Experience." Apple also sent a cease‑and‑desist letter in the following months, urging the theatre to stop using the name. The technology giant claims that all of these warnings were ignored by Apple Cinemas and it continued to promote itself under the same name while going full throttle with its expansion plans.
In its filing, Apple states that “Apple Cinemas is knowingly and intentionally using the name Apple to sow confusion for its own benefit.” The lawsuit seeks an injunction to stop further confusion, seek monetary damages, and the possibility of court‑ordered rebranding. Apple has also acknowledged that the theatre industry is different from the technology business that it operates in, but the company argues that brand dilution and misinterpretation are risks that it cannot ignore.
Apple only wants to safeguard its identity, and the cinema wants to grow its business to expand, but at this point, it remains to be seen which side the court ruling would fall on. It would also set an important benchmark for future trademark disputes between unrelated industries. Do you think the court will side with Apple, since the company is also involved in the movie industry and has some connection to it?
Follow Wccftech on Google to get more of our news coverage in your feeds.
