ASUS Zenbook Duo “Intel Core Ultra X9 388H” Laptop Review: Panther Lake Roars With Strong Graphics & Efficiency

Jan 26, 2026 at 09:00am EST

Intel's CPU journey has been a roller coaster this decade, from the highs of Alder Lake and Lunar Lake to the lows of Arrow Lake. While the company has been strong in certain departments each generation, the one department where Intel has really managed to show its expertise is offering a chip that not just uses a hybrid architecture approach but also mixes and matches several IPs together. It all started with Alder Lake, got refined in Raptor Lake, built into a singular SoC with Meteor Lake, tested for higher-efficiency with Lunar Lake, and then for higher-performance with Arrow Lake. All of these iterations were done to create the one perfect chip that does it all, and that is Panther Lake.

Earlier this month, all PC vendors, including Intel, showcased their next-gen SoCs, codenamed Core Ultra Series 3. And they showed how they are better than their competitiors previous or current-gen offerings. None of the chips launching this year have yet been compared against one another, and Intel launching Panther Lake first shows that they are confident that they can handle the impending war.

Related Story Intel Panther Lake & Wildcat Lake Arrive On Desktop PCs With First MoDT Designs From Maxsun

Panther Lake has a lot to prove; it has to prove that Intel's 18A process node is a viable technology for future products and that the blue team is on the right path. It has to prove that Intel can deliver a good balance of performance and efficiency in a singular package rather than having two different versions like Lunar Lake and Arrow Lake, it has to prove that Intel's graphics division is still worth a shot, not just at iGPUs, but also at dGPUs, and it has formidable opponenents lined up this year such as AMD's Ryzen AI 400, and Qualcomm's Snapdragon Elite X2.

Panther Lake also comes at a time when the entire PC market is in the tight grip of the memory crisis, which has led to prices skyrocketing for all consumer-aimed products, including PCs and laptops. While everyone is riding the "AI" craze, Intel's Panther Lake launch shows that they are still focused at the client market, and with the amount of showtime that Panther Lake recieved, which was almost the entirety of it, it looks like Intel at least wants consumers to enjoy a good PC experience, and not just back up their products with the new beloved buzzword of the tech industry.

So today, Intel is launching its Panther Lake "Core Ultra Series 3" processor family. These chips feature brand new CPU cores, GPU cores, NPU cores, many new technologies which we highlighted in our deep-dive here, and then some more. For this testing, Intel provided us with the ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (UX8407), a high-end device featuring the flagship Core Ultra X9 388H processor with Arc B390 graphics.

ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 Laptop - Specifications At A Glance

In terms of specifications, the ASUS Zenbook Duo "UX8407" laptop is equipped with the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H CPU. This is the flagship processor within the Panther Lake-H mobile lineup and has a lot to talk about, so let's get started.

The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H CPU features 16 cores in total with 16 threads. These are a combination of 4 P-Cores, 8 E-Cores, and 4 LPE cores based on the Cougar Cove P-Core and Darkmont E-Core architecture.

The CPU has a base frequency of 2.1 GHz and boosts up to 5.1 GHz on the P-Cores, while the E-Cores have a base frequency of 1.6 GHz and a boost frequency of 3.8 GHz. The LPE cores clock in at 1.6 GHz base and 3.7 GHz boost clocks. The chip features an 18 MB L3 cache, 21 MB L2 cache, and has a TDP rating of 25W at the base and 80W MTP (Maximum Turbo Power). The chip can also be configured down to 15W as its minimum assured power rating (shouldn't be mistaken with idle power).

For the iGPU, Intel is using an upgraded version of its Battlemage architecture known as Xe3. The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H is configured with the Arc B390 GPU, which offers 12 Xe cores that clock up to 2.50 GHz and feature a maximum TOPS (INT8) rating of up to 120. The iGPU supports all the latest APIs and AI Frameworks, including newer Ray Tracing Units and even support for XeSS MFG, which is far better than the DP4a model on the older Alchemist-based iGPUs.

On the NPU side, the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H is equipped with an updated NPU5, which offers a peak TOPS (INT8) of 50 and supports all the latest AI frameworks such as OpenVINO, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT & WebNN.

Intel Core Ultra Series 3 CPU Lineup Specs (Official):

CPU ModelP-Cores (Cougar Cove)E-Cores (Darkmont)LP-E Cores (Skymont)CPU Clocks (Max)Xe3 iGPU CoresTDP (Base / MTP)
Core Ultra X9 388H4845.1 GHz12 @ 2.50 GHz25-80W
Core Ultra 9 386H4844.9 GHz4 @ 2.50 GHz25-80W
Core Ultra X7 368H4845.0 GHz12 @ 2.50 GHz25-80W
Core Ultra 7 366H4844.8 GHz4 @ 2.50 GHz25-80W
Core Ultra 7 3654044.8 GHz4 @ 2.50 GHz25-55W
Core Ultra X7 358H4844.8 GHz12 @ 2.50 GHz25-80W
Core Ultra 7 356H4844.7 GHz4 @ 2.45 GHz25-80W
Core Ultra 7 355H4044.7 GHz4 @ 2.50 GHz25-55W
Core Ultra 5 338H4444.7 GHz10 @ 2.40 GHz25-80W
Core Ultra 5 336H4444.6 GHz4 @ 2.30 GHz25-80W
Core Ultra 5 3354044.6 GHz4 @ 2.45 GHz25-55W
Core Ultra 5 3322044.4 GHz2 @ 2.30 GHz25-55W
Core Ultra 5 3254044.5 GHz4 @ 2.45 GHz25-55W
Core Ultra 5 3222044.4 GHz2 @ 2.30 GHz25-55W

With the internals of the CPU covered, let's talk about the rest of the specifications. First, we have the memory, which comes in the form of 32 GB of LPDDR5X. These are 64-bit DRAM modules that are rated at 9600 MT/s speeds, and this is soldered memory, so you'd better keep in mind the configuration you are purchasing based on your demands. Storage includes a 1 TB SSD.

Being a dual-screen laptop, the ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 features two 14" and 3K (2880x1800) OLED panels with a 16:10 aspect ratio, a 144Hz refresh rate (0.2ms), 500nits of peak brightness, and Display HDR TrueBlack 1000 certification. The screen-to-body ratio is 93%. ASUS has also developed a new hinge design that is better and more durable than the previous iterations. The new design features a 5% smaller footprint, 8.28mm thin, & weighing just 1.65 kg. The dual fan configuration enables up to 45W of cooling.

The laptop comes with a 99Whr battery and is bundled with a 100W AC Ultra Mini adapter. IO includes dual Thunderbolt 4 ports, HDMI 2.1, USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-A ports, 6 speakers, WIFI7. There's also a magnetic keyboard that docks over the second screen and can also be used undocked wirelessly with Bluetooth. It has its own charging and can easily last several days without requiring a charge.

ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 Laptop - CPU Performance

We start by comparing the 3DMark CPU Profile tests, where the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H offers a 14% boost in single-thread and an impressive 24.4% boost in multi-core tests despite featuring the same number of cores (16 vs 16). The chip offers twice the core/thread count as Lunar Lake, and sips a similar amount of power while offering almost double the performance.

3DMark CPU Profile (Higher is Better)
Max Threads
16 Threads
8 Threads
4 Threads
2 Threads
1 Thread
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
10449
10242
6492
4327
2306
1207
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
8396
8478
6576
4236
2140
1061
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
6348
6149
5276
3664
2202
1157
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
5751
5736
5756
3708
2085
1139

The X9 388H reaches new heights in terms of memory and cache performance on AIDA64. With its ultra-fast 9600 MT/s LP5X solution, it not only delivers higher memory bandwidth but also offers much lower latency than the past-gen offerings, dropping in the sub-90ns range.

AIDA64 Cache & Memory Benchmark "Memory* Cache MB/s" (Higher is Better)
Read
Write
Copy
Latency
0
21999
43998
65997
87996
109995
131994
0
21999
43998
65997
87996
109995
131994
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
118780
131990
125950
83.2
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
90437
102002
82305
119.7
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
87465
114041
104473
99.9
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
78486
75644
86896
137.6

For Blender, the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H "Panther Lake" CPU delivers a 23% boost over the 285H in Classroom render, a 35.5% boost in Junkshop render, and a stunning 47.5% boost in Monster render.

Blender "Samples Per Minute"  (Higher is Better)
monster
junkshop
classroom
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
130.4
88.92
62.55
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
106
65.6
42.4
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
90
65.9
44.2
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
63
39.4
28.2

In CPU-Z, the single-core score takes a hit and is only slightly faster than the Core Ultra 7 258V Lunar Lake chip, but in multi-threading, the X9 388H takes the lead over the 285H by 4%.

CPU-z 2.13.0 (Higher is Better)
Single-Core
Multi-Core
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
776.6
9680
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
829.3
9336
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
800.2
6300
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
741.4
4959

For Cinebench, Intel's Panther Lake secures the top spot in single-core performance with 130 points. In the multi-threaded test, it surpasses the 285H by 43% and stomps Lunar Lake with a 2.24 lead. This is highly impressive for Panther Lake.

Cinebench 2024 (Higher is Better)
Single-Core
Multi-Core
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
130
1324
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
123
928
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
113
832
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
119
591

Geekbench 6 is the same story with the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H securing top place in the single-core tests, and offering a 11.1% boost over the 285H. This is faster than Arrow Lake performance with power draw similar to Lunar Lake. Loving it!

Geekbench 6 (Higher is Better)
Single-Core
Multi-Core
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
3011
17819
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
2949
16032
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
2820
12693
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
2616
10805

Lunar Lake surprised us with its strong Office task performance in Procyon, and Panther Lake extends this lead, offering top-tier power.

UL Procyon Office Suite (Higher is Better)
Word
Excel
PowerPoint
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
9526
7151
7248
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
8131
6706
6730
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
7807
6459
7699
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
6198
6103
6448

In the WinRAR compression test, the Core Ultra X9 388H is 28% faster than the Arrow Lake 285H, and more than double the performance of the Lunar Lake 8-core chip.

Winrar 7.01 (Higher is Better)
Speed (KB/s)
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
20370
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
17515
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
15911
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
8666

ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 Laptop - AI Synthetic Performance

Next up, we have our AI benchmarks for the latest Intel and AMD CPUs. First up, we have the Geekbench AI benchmarks, where the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H offers anywhere from 20% to 50% boost in the ONNX tests. Running the same tests on the GPU and NPU results in an even higher performance uplift versus the AMD XDNA 2 architecture and Intel's prior generation NPUs on Lunar Lake and Arrow Lake chips. The full results can be seen below:

Geekbench AI "ONNX" CPU (Higher is Better)
Single Precision
Half Precision
Quantized Score
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
4900
1872
9214
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
3865
1525
6228
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
3216
1483
6144
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
2338
1223
4695
Geekbench AI "ONNX" DirectML (Higher is Better)
Single Precision
Half Precision
Quantized Score
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
11871
20120
7879
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
7668
9781
5280
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
7618
14097
5332
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
6799
9297
5380
Geekbench AI "OpenVINO" (Higher is Better)
Single Precision
Half Precision
Quantized Score
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H/GPU)
19048
47669
59178
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V/GPU)
10524
23874
27175
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H/GPU)
9504
18769
22718
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H/CPU)
4727
4281
9112
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365/CPU)
4522
4620
11679
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H/NPU)
4144
8248
11898
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H/CPU)
4151
3134
9544
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V/NPU)
2998
20336
28887
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V/CPU)
2991
1739
7664

For UL Procyon, we again see Intel's Core Ultra X9 388H and its various AI accelerators, such as the NPU and the GPU, offering better performance capabilities than the Ryzen AI offerings.

UL Procyon AI Suite With NPU "Integer Precision" (Higher is Better)
Score
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H/GPU)
2475
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H/NPU)
2211
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V/NPU)
1751
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365/NPU)
1732
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V/GPU)
1417
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H/GPU)
1177
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H/NPU)
684
UL Procyon AI Text Generation (Higher is Better)
Score
Average TTFT (Seconds)
Average OTS (Tokens/s)
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
1726
0.37
42.97
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
888
1.24
21.46
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
616
1.42
11.82
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
233
13.08
15.53
UL Procyon AI Image Generation "Stable Diffusion 1.5 FP16" (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
Generation Speed (s/image)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H/GPU @ INT8)
6931
4.509
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V/GPU @ INT8)
2313
13.505
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H/GPU @ INT8)
1858
16.816
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H/GPU)
661
9.443
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V/GPU)
358
17.420
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H/GPU)
344
18.124
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365/GPU)
95
65.414

ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 Laptop - GPU Synthetic Performance

Now we are going to look at the GPU performance, and before we present to you the gaming numbers, we first have to see how the performance fares in synthetic benchmarks. For this purpose, we first want to outline the single-precision FLOPs each iGPU offers. Intel's Battlemage, Alchemist+, and AMD's RDNA 3.5 are entirely different architectures, and despite the FLOPS of the Radeon iGPU being higher, it doesn't necessarily mean that the Radeon iGPU will be faster.

But with that said, the following is how the two chips compare:

Single Precision Flops "FP32" (Higher is Better)
GFLOPS
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
ASUS Zenbook Duo (Arc B390)
7422
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
6037
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
4790
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
3982

In 3DMark Speed Way, a purely raytracing benchmark, we see that the Arc B390 iGPU is the fastest among the bunch.

3DMark Speed Way (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
ASUS Zenbook Duo (Arc B390)
1021
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
896
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
511
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
479

For 3DMark Steel Nomad, we get to see our first non-RT performance of the Intel Arc B390 iGPU, and here, it delivers a massive 2x boost over the 8 Xe2 iGPU for Lunar Lake, and a 3.15x boost over the Radeon 880M.

3DMark Steel Nomad (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
ASUS Zenbook Duo (Arc B390)
1652
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
827
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
823
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
524

In 3DMark Port Royal, the Intel Arc B390 iGPU offers a 2.68x lead over the Radeon iGPU. This is a ray tracing-heavy benchmark and goes on to show that the results we saw in the Speed Way test are an anomaly, something that you will also notice in the gaming tests. It is also 89% faster than the Arc 140V iGPU.

3DMark Port Royal (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
0
900
1800
2700
3600
4500
5400
0
900
1800
2700
3600
4500
5400
ASUS Zenbook Duo (Arc B390)
4066
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
2146
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
1843
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
1515

In 3DMark Time Spy, Intel's Arc B390 iGPU once again leads with a 2.40x higher graphics score than its competitor, and a 73% boost over its predecessor.

3DMark Time Spy (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
Graphics Score
CPU Score
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
ASUS Zenbook Duo (Arc B390)
7730
7099
15577
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
4396
4112
7238
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
4447
4047
10136
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
3297
2965
9024

For Fire Strike, Intel offers great performance even on DX11 APIs, which is a good showcase, as many games still run on DX11. We can also see the CPU performance here, which is up 21.1% versus the 285H.

3DMark Fire Strike (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
Graphics Score
Physics Score
0
7000
14000
21000
28000
35000
42000
0
7000
14000
21000
28000
35000
42000
ASUS Zenbook Duo (Arc B390)
14453
17221
33284
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
9153
10138
22169
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
8315
8902
27466
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
7322
7866
23949

Lastly, we have 3DMark Night Raid, where Intel scores another 60%+ lead over the Arc 140T and more than 2x over the AMD RDNA 3.5 iGPU.

3DMark Night Raid (Higher is Better)
Overall Score
Graphics Score
CPU Score
0
13334
26668
40002
53336
66670
80004
0
13334
26668
40002
53336
66670
80004
ASUS Zenbook Duo (Arc B390)
49369
76266
16465
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
35222
46927
14595
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
32715
40055
16050
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
27742
34860
12861

ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 Laptop - HD Gaming Performance

With the synthetic performance out of the way, we can start taking a look at pure gaming numbers, and we start off our testing spree with Cyberpunk 2077 running at Medium Preset at 1200P. With Balanced XeSS/FSR upscaling, the Arc B390 iGPU delivers a 68% uplift in performance, and with frame-gen enabled, the lead touches 98%.

Cyberpunk 2077 (1200P, Medium Preset)
Average FPS (Balanced Upscaling)
Average FPS (Balanced Frame-Gen)
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
ASUS Zenbook Duo (Arc B390)
93.37
151.59
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V XeSS)
55.64
76.55
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T XeSS)
44.13
63.50
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M FSR)
40.15
59.93

In Forza Horizon 5, we ran the game using Quality Upscaling at the Medium Preset at 1200P, and the Arc B390 blew away the previous-gen 140V/140T iGPUs with an over 70% performance uplift.

Forza Horizon 5 (1200p, Medium, Quality Upscaling)
Average FPS
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Arc B390 XeSS)
106
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T XeSS)
62
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V XeSS)
61
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M FSR)
56

F1 24 is one of the titles that support XeSS2 Frame Gen, and the Arc GPUs take full advantage of it, offering up to 154 FPS, a 90% uplift over the Arc 140V.

F1 24 (1200P, High Preset)
Average FPS (Balanced Upscaling)
Average FPS (Balanced Frame-Gen)
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Arc B390 XeSS)
99
154
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V XeSS)
54
81
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T XeSS)
54
80
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M FSR)
42
69

In Horizon Zero Dawn at the "Favor Quality" preset, we used the FSR 2 upscaling set to Balanced. Here, the Arc B390 delivers a 60% uplift over the Radeon 880M, and a 96% uplift over the Arc 140V.

Horizon Zero Dawn (1200p, Favor Quality, FSR2 On)
Average FPS
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Arc B390)
90
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
56
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
51
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V XeSS)
46

Metro Exodus previously ran at 30 FPS with RT enabled on current Arc/Radeon iGPUs, but with the Arc B390, we can finally enjoy 60 FPS+ RT performance in this title.

Metro Exodus (1080p, High Preset, RT Normal)
Average FPS
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Arc B390)
61.12
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
30.47
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
28.30
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
22.19

Lastly, we have The Callisto Protocol, where the Intel Arc B390 iGPU leads by a respectable 64%, and a 90% lead over the Radeon 880M.

The Callisto Protocol (1200p, Medium, FSR2 On)
Average FPS
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Arc B390)
71.18
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Arc 140V)
43.4
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Radeon 880M)
37.5
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Arc 140T)
34.6

Lastly, we chose to see how the Arc B390 performs when we crank up the settings to the max in each of the tested titles at 1080p.

High Fidelity Gaming
Core Ultra X9 388H @45W
Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 @54W
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
Cyberpunk 2077 (High/1080p/Quality/Frame-Gen)
112.81
72.10
Cyberpunk 2077 (High/1080p/Quality/ No Frame-Gen)
71.79
46.11
F1 24 (Ultra High/1080p/Quality/ Frame-Gen)
71
138
Forza Horizon 5 (Ultra/1080p/Quality/ No Frame-Gen)
49
103
Callisto Protocol (Ultra/1080//Quality)
69.70
95.83
Horizon Zero Dawn (Ultimate/1080p/Quality)
85
115
Metro Exodus EE (Extreme/1080p/Quality)
23.49
33.79

ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 Laptop - Thermals, Power & Battery

A major factor of today's laptops is their power consumption, and in that regard, the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H CPU has a higher out-of-the-box power profile set at 45W versus the 28W of AMD's Ryzen AI 9 365. Both laptops are set to their "Balanced" preset by default, but you can opt into the "Performance" mode through the MyASUS application. These are just power profiles, and actual power consumption can be very different.

In our case, the Panther Lake laptop almost never went above 40W, and only hit its peak power of 69W in stress tests. The gaming numbers show that the chip is very efficient and is on par with other chips of the same category while delivering some big performance uplifts.

Power Ratings & Consumption
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
OOB TDP
45
35
28
17
PL1 Peak
64
64
48
37
Idle Power
3.11
2.88
3.19
2.28
Media Playback
5.66
9
6
4.5
Gaming Power
39
40
32
32
Peak Power
69
73
71
42

Panther Lake does get a bit hotter than the other chips. This thin and light design from ASUS is rated at 45W, so we did see thermal throttling in AIDA64's stress test. That wasn't the case while gaming, but even then, the laptop gets warm around 70-80 °C.

Temperatures
ASUS Zenbook Duo 2026 (Core Ultra X9 388H)
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Idle
42
38
42
44
Gaming
72
66
60
70
Peak
96
97
70
91

The Intel Panther Lake CPUs do deliver some amazing battery timings with the Office Productivity Suite test in UL Procyon, offering over 22 hours worth of time versus AMD's 12-13 hours. For gaming tests, you can get up to 4 hours of battery time with the Arc B390, with the brightness set to 60%, while the Radeon 880M ends up closer to 3 hours. Furthermore, for video playback and lightweight tasks, the laptop can even offer over 30 hours of battery time with the second screen disabled, which is superb.

Battery Capacity
Whr
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
ASUS Zenbook Duo (Core Ultra X9 388H)
99
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
99
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
82
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
72
Battery Tests
UL Office Productivity (Battery Minutes)
Gaming Performance (Battery Minutes)
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
0
400
800
1200
1600
2000
2400
ASUS Zenbook Duo (Core Ultra X9 388H)
1378
305
ASUS Zenbook S14 (Core Ultra 7 258V)
1311
284
MSI Prestige AI EVO 16 B2HMG (Core Ultra 9 285H)
1224
258
MSI Prestige A16 AI+ A3HM (Ryzen AI 9 365)
752
187

Conclusion - 18A Is Alive & Panther Lake Is Fierce

After testing out the ASUS Zenbook Duo featuring the Core Ultra X9 388H, all I can say is that Intel has delivered superbly with Panther Lake.

Starting with the CPU performance, it's kind of a surprise that Panther Lake is offering anywhere from 10 to 25% boost in multi-threading performance while keeping the same core count, and lower P-Cores than Arrow Lake-H. The chip also offers a nice 10-15% boost in single-core performance,nce which is decent for its 5.1 GHz boost clock. What's more impressive is that the chip mostly stood at 50W or sub-50W power in a large selection of MT workloads, driving efficiency up.

What isn't a surprise is the GPU performance; Intel already spoiled the fun when it showcased its official Arc B390 figures at CES and later let us test out the gaming performance in a variety of games. But all said and done, Intel now offers the fastest iGPU in thin and light platforms. Even at lower TDPs, the Arc B390 delivers stupendous amounts of performance, matching entry-level discrete GPUs such as the RTX 4050, & even coming close to the huge Ryzen AI MAX+ 395 chip. We want to give a special shoutout to Phawx, who showcases what PTL at sub-30W TDPs is able to do, and things look really good for upcoming Core Ultra Series 3-based handheld devices.

Plus, the iGPU is backed by the most advanced feature set. It has faster ray tracing cores, it has better AI cores, it has superb image quality with XeSS 3, and it even supports MFG. Intel is by far the only vendor that offers Multi-frame-generation across more than 1 generation of GPUs and iGPUs, and Battlemage's Xe3 uplift is by far the best iteration of the blue team's ML-powered upscaling ventures. Software support for the Arc B390 iGPU is also good right from the start, and we can only expect it to get better with fine-tuned performance and power profiles across various titles as more platforms hit the road.

Intel also continues to work on its NPU for the Copilot+ "AI PC" ecosystem. Although 50 TOPS matches AMD's Ryzen AI 300 series and comes close to the 60 TOPS NPUs on Ryzen AI 400, or slightly lags behind Qualcomm's 80 TOPS, what we see in real-world performance is that mature software matters more than just AI TOPS. And Intel is backing its NPU with that approach, delivering solid performance that truly outclasses the other SoC lineups.

Battery timing on the ASUS Zenbook Duo with its 99Wh battery was also outclass, with over 22 hours of productivity time, almost 30 hours of standard video playback with 40% brightness, & a handful of hours for gaming. Panther Lake is matching Lunar Lake's battery life in most cases while delivering performance far superior to Arrow Lake; it's the best of both worlds. The chip does get a bit toasty, and the 45W TDP of cooling performance on the Duo shows that Panther Lake has a lot left on offer if we can get past the thermal limits. Laptops with higher-end cooling and Mini PCs will truly showcase the power of Panther Lake, and we can't wait to get our hands on those.

Talking a little bit about the ASUS ZenBook Duo 2026, it is a phenomenal design, a true thin and light PC, with lots of power, a good set of IO, and a gorgeous dual-screen OLED integration that works seamlessly, and with the added wireless keyboard, your whole PC experience is elevated to a whole new level. It just goes to show how good a job Intel did with Panther Lake that OEMs decided to create beautiful PCs such as the ZenBook Duo around it. Panther Lake has delivered stunningly, and we can't wait to see and test more devices, especially handhelds, on this amazing chip.

About the author: A Software Engineer by training and a PC enthusiast by passion, Hassan Mujtaba serves as Wccftech's Senior Editor for hardware section. With years of experience in the industry, he specializes in deep-dive technical analysis of next-generation CPU and GPU architectures, motherboards, and cooling solutions. His work involves not only breaking news on upcoming technologies but also extensive hands-on reviews and benchmarking.

Follow Wccftech on Google to get more of our news coverage in your feeds.