Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24 Core CPU Benchmarked In CPU-Z & Blender, Up To 19% Faster, Both Ultra 7 265K & Ultra 5 245K Tested Too

Oct 17, 2024 at 12:31pm EDT
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24 Core CPU Benchmarked In CPU-Z & Blender, Up To 19% Faster, Both Ultra 7 265K & Ultra 5 245K Tested Too 1

Intel's Core Ultra 9 285K flagship CPU along with the Core Ultra 7 265K and Core Ultra 5 245K have been tested in various benchmarks.

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K CPU achieves up to 19% performance over 14900K in Blender Benchmark, Core Ultra 7 265K & Core Ultra 5 245K Tested Too

Intel revealed its latest Core Ultra 200 Series aka Arrow Lake processors on 10th October, which comprises five SKUs for the initial launch. The Core Ultra 9 285K is the fastest in the series, featuring 24 cores/24 threads, challenging the current flagship Core i9 14900K from the Raptor Lake Refresh family.

Related Story Intel Nova Lake-S “LGA 1954” Desktop CPU Pictured For The First Time

The processor was recently benchmarked in two different programs, showing some good scores in the multi-threaded benchmarks but had some issues. As spotted by @momomo_us, reviewers are now Benchmarking the Core Ultra 9 285K in CPU-Z, using the ASRock Z890 Steel Legend WiFi. It's not clear what CPU cooler was used but looks like it wasn't enough to cool down this beast.

Source: Valid.x86.fr

From the results, we can see that the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K achieved an impressive 18964 points in multi-threaded performance, which outperforms all the previous flagship mainstream Intel Core i9 processors. However, the single-core score maxed at 909 points, which is still behind many Core i9s from both Raptor Lake and Raptor Lake Refresh families.

CPU-z (Higher is Better)
Single-Thread
Multi-Thread
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
Core Ultra 9 285K
909
18964
Core i9-14900KS (Performance)
933
17992
Core i9-14900KS (Baseline)
926
17846
Core i9-14900K (Performance)
914
17385
Core i9-13900K (Performance)
899
16992
Ryzen 9 9950X
885
16892
Core i9-14900K (Baseline)
902
16642
Ryzen 9 7950X
789
15822
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
780
15045

Nonetheless, what we see is that the CPU reached a whopping 101°C, which is pretty close to its maximum operating temperature limit of 105°C. This looks like a clear case of thermal throttling, which affects the performance. The CPU did reach its max P-Core and E-Core boost clocks of 5.5 GHz and 4.6 GHz respectively but at this temperature, it's hard to sustain these clock speeds for long.

Image Source: CPU-z validation

One more thing to notice from the details page is that the Uncore or Ring Bus clock is mentioned as 3790.9 MHz, which is reportedly 700 MHz lower than the Core i9 14900K. This is why some leaks report little improvements in gaming performance.

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K CPU was also benchmarked in Blender v4.2(via @9550pro) and scored 557.46 points. This initial test is much better than the performance of Core i9 14900K, which scored 475.97 points but it still loses to Ryzen 9 9950X, which scored 598.7 points.

Image Credit: @9950pro

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K, Core Ultra 7 265K & Core Ultra 5 245K  have also been tested in Blender. The Core Ultra 9 285K scored 566.88 points while the Core Ultra 7 265K scored 471.21 points and the Core Ultra 5 245K scored 323.46 points.

Blender (Higher is Better)
Score
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Ryzen 9 9950X
598.67
Core Ultra 9 285K
566.88
Ryzen 9 7950X
536.93
Core i9-14900K
476.23
Core Ultra 7 265K
471.21
Ryzen 9 9900X
461.17
Core i7-14700K
431.8
Core Ultra 5 245K
323.46
Core i5-14600K
293.04
Ryzen 7 9700X
281.17
Ryzen 5 9600X
217.87

We don't know the motherboard used or any information about the configurations in both cases. So, it can be a bit early to tell if this is the true performance of both chips. We are one week away from the official (24th October) launch and it's expected that we may see more such performance numbers of Arrow Lake chips.

News Sources: @momomo_us, @9550pro

About the author: Sarfraz Khan is a hardware reporter with a focus on PC components and the builder community. With years of experience writing about PC hardware and laptops, his work has been featured on several reputable technology publications. Sarfraz's hands-on experience is demonstrated through his first-person accounts of using and comparing different hardware configurations, providing practical and relatable insights for everyday users. His technical analysis is respected by peers in the enthusiast community and has been cited by specialized hardware sites such as Germany's Igor's Lab.

Follow Wccftech on Google to get more of our news coverage in your feeds.