Intel Core Ultra 5 236V “Lunar Lake” CPU Spotted On Geekbench, Entry-Level 17W Chip For Thin & Light Laptops

Jul 25, 2024 at 01:45am EDT

A Lenovo laptop based on Intel's Core Ultra 5 236V "Lunar Lake" CPU was benchmarked on Geekbench today.

The 8-core Intel Core Ultra 5 236V "Lunar Lake" CPU shows up inside a Lenovo-based laptop

This is neither the first nor the last time we are getting leaks about Intel Lunar Lake CPUs. Roughly two weeks back, we saw the performance of Core Ultra 5 256V on Geekbench, outperforming Ryzen 8840HS convincingly in both single and multi-core tests.

Related Story Foxconn & Intel Enter Strategic Partnership To Jointly Develop And Deploy AI Infrastructure And Computing Platforms To Take Advantage Of Booming Demand

This time, we have the leaked benchmark numbers of the Intel Core Ultra 5 236V CPU. The processor is from the Ultra 5 200V series we are seeing in action, used inside a Lenovo laptop planned for release soon.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 236V scored 2021 in single-core and 5743 points in multi-core tests. The operating system was Windows 11 Pro and as we can see from the specs, it boasts a base clock frequency of 2.10 GHz. It is an 8-core/8-thread chip with a maximum frequency of 4.67 GHz (4668 MHz to be precise), coinciding with what is known from the specifications of the Core Ultra 200V lineup. Compared to the Core Ultra 256V, it has a 4 MB less L3 cache(8 MB vs 12 MB on 256V) and slightly slower base/boost clocks.

Image Source: Geekbench 6

Despite the same core/thread count, the performance seems to be pretty lackluster compared to what we have seen on the higher-end chips like 256V and 268V. This is probably due to the lower clock speeds as well as the smaller L3 cache size. However, unlike the insignificant performance difference between the Core Ultra 7 256V and Core Ultra 7 268V as seen on Geekbench, the 236V is roughly 45-50% slower than both in multi-core tests.

We do not know if the CPU was benchmarked on the Balanced, High-Performance, or Power-Saver plan due to the absence of such information, and we probably would need a few more benchmark results to conclude. It is also likely that this could be an early engineering sample or a very lowly configured test platform.

Geekbench 6.3.0 CPU MT Test (Higher is Better)
Multi-Core
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
0
4000
8000
12000
16000
20000
24000
Ryzen 9 7900X (120W)
17860
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (55W+)
16452
Ryzen 7 7700X (105W)
15273
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (28W+)
14773
Ryzen 9 7845HX (55W+)
13660
Ryzen AI 9 365 (28W+)
13032
Core Ultra 9 185H (45W+)
12084
Ryzen 9 8945HS (45W+)
11775
Ryzen 9 7940HS (45W+)
11527
Core Ultra 7 256V (17W+)
11031
Core Ultra 7 268V (17W+)
10036
Ryzen 7 8840HS (28W+)
9522
Ryzen 5 8640HS (28W+)
7844
Core Ultra 5 236V (17W+)
5743
Geekbench 6.3.0 CPU ST Test (Higher is Better)
Single-Core
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Ryzen 9 7900X (120W)
2926
Ryzen 7 7700X (105W)
2912
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (28W+)
2833
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (55W+)
2819
Core Ultra 7 268V (17W+)
2739
Core Ultra 7 256V (17W+)
2737
Ryzen AI 9 365 (28W+)
2730
Ryzen 9 7845HX (55W+)
2628
Ryzen 9 8945HS (45W+)
2380
Ryzen 9 7940HS (45W+)
2367
Core Ultra 9 185H (45W+)
2246
Ryzen 5 8640HS (28W+)
2146
Ryzen 7 8840HS (28W+)
2139
Core Ultra 5 236V (17W+)
2021

However, do keep in mind that Geekbench isn't the best option to calculate the exact performance of a CPU. The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V lost to 256V on Geekbench multi-core performance by a small margin, which shouldn't happen since 268V features higher clock speeds.

Still, the performance numbers gave a pretty decent idea of where the Core Ultra 5 200V SKUs would stand against the Core Ultra 7 200V chips. That said, the single-core performance of Core Ultra 5 236V looks somewhat better by being 30-35% slower than 256V if we take all the different benchmarks of the latter in Geekbench.

Intel's Lunar Lake "Core Ultra 200V" CPU family is built for power-efficient laptops with most of its SKUs operating in a 17W/30W power range.

According to Intel's official PR, Lunar Lake is set to launch in Q3 2024 with September being the most likely launch month, which means we are going to see more such benchmarks just days before the official launch. We have already covered Lunar Lake architecture in detail previously, which explains its advanced and efficient SOC design, featuring Lion Cove P-Core and Skymont E-Core architectures, and Intel Arc-based graphics.

Intel Lunar Lake "Core Ultra 200V" CPU Lineup:

SKU NameCores / ThreadsCache (LLC)P-Core / E-Core BoostGPU (Max Clock)PL1/Min/MTPMemory ConfigurationNPU / XMX (GPU) TOPs
Core Ultra 9 288V8/812 MB5.1 / 3.7 GHzArc 140V @ 2.05 GHz30/17/37W32 GB (2R) LPDDR5X48/67
Core Ultra 7 268V8/812 MB5.0 / 3.7 GHzArc 140V @ 2.00 GHz17/8/37W32 GB (2R) LPDDR5X48/66
Core Ultra 7 266V8/812 MB5.0 / 3.7 GHzArc 140V @ 2.00 GHz17/8/37W16 GB (1R) LPDDR5X48/66
Core Ultra 7 258V8/812 MB4.8 / 3.7 GHzArc 140V @ 1.95 GHz17/8/37W32 GB (2R) LPDDR5X47/64
Core Ultra 7 256V8/812 MB4.8 / 3.7 GHzArc 140V @ 1.95 GHz17/8/37W16 GB (1R) LPDDR5X47/64
Core Ultra 5 238V8/88 MB4.7 / 3.5 GHzArc 130V @ 1.85 GHz17/8/37W32 GB (2R) LPDDR5X40/53
Core Ultra 5 236V8/88 MB4.7 / 3.5 GHzArc 130V @ 1.85 GHz17/8/37W16 GB (1R) LPDDR5X40/53
Core Ultra 5 228V8/88 MB4.5 / 3.5 GHzArc 130V @ 1.85 GHz17/8/37W32 GB (2R) LPDDR5X40/53
Core Ultra 5 226V8/88 MB4.5 / 3.5 GHzArc 130V @ 1.85 GHz17/8/37W16 GB (1R) LPDDR5X40/53

About the author: Sarfraz Khan is a hardware reporter with a focus on PC components and the builder community. With years of experience writing about PC hardware and laptops, his work has been featured on several reputable technology publications. Sarfraz's hands-on experience is demonstrated through his first-person accounts of using and comparing different hardware configurations, providing practical and relatable insights for everyday users. His technical analysis is respected by peers in the enthusiast community and has been cited by specialized hardware sites such as Germany's Igor's Lab.

Follow Wccftech on Google to get more of our news coverage in your feeds.