AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB GPU Benchmarks Leak: Slower Than RX 7700 XT In Vulkan & OpenCL Tests

May 28, 2025 at 07:51am EDT

AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT "RDNA 4" GPU benchmarks have appeared for the first time in the Geekbench database, and show slower performance than the RX 7700 XT, an RDNA 3-based graphics card.

AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT GPU With 16 GB VRAM Tested In Geekbench Benchmarks, RDNA 4 Vs RDNA 3

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT is going to be the mainstream gaming offering within the RDNA 4 lineup. The graphics card will come in two flavors: a 16 GB model, which will be priced at $349 US, and an 8 GB model, which is going to be priced at $299 US. The 16 GB model has now been tested within the Geekbench benchmark, but before getting into the numbers, let's talk a bit about the specifications the card has on offer.

Related Story AMD’s Frank Azor Pushes Back on FSR 4.1 Cancellation Rumor for RDNA 3.5 iGPUs, Says No Such Decision Has Been Made

With the Radeon RX 9060 XT, AMD is leveraging the TSMC 4nm process technology and dialing up the clock speeds to 11. The chip features a boost clock of up to 3.13 GHz, making it the first GPU to have such a high frequency out of the box. We can expect custom models to operate around 3.2-3.3 GHz. The GPU also features a TBP of 150 to 182W, which is respective to the VRAM featured on each SKU.

Image Credits: AMD

That's also why we have to talk about the memory solution used by the RX 9060 XT. The graphics card will come in both 8 GB and 16 GB variants. The card will feature a 128-bit bus interface and a 20 Gbps GDDR6 memory solution. The card feels very similar to the RTX 5060 Ti regarding its memory configuration, but the competition is leveraging faster GDDR7 memory. It was rumored that AMD might cancel the 8 GB variant in response to the poor reception of NVIDIA's 8 GB 5060 Ti and 5060, but that doesn't seem to be the case.

Image Source: Geekbench

Starting with the OpenCL benchmark score, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB graphics card scored 109315 points, which is 31% faster than the RX 7600 XT 16 GB but 14% slower than the RX 7700 XT.

Geekbench OpenCL GPU Benchmark (Higher is Better)
Score
0
31202
62404
93606
124808
156010
187212
0
31202
62404
93606
124808
156010
187212
RX 7900 XT
187212
RX 7900 GRE
167617
RX 9070 XT
158990
RX 7800 XT
140279
RX 7700 XT
127276
RX 9060 XT
109315
RX 7600 XT
83313
Image Source: Geekbench

We see the same scenario in the Vulkan tests, where the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT sits at 25% faster than the Radeon RX 7600 XT 16 GB graphics card, but ends up 12% slower than the RX 7700 XT, and that's a very similarly priced solution in the current market.

Geekbench Vulkan GPU Benchmark (Higher is Better)
Score
0
31469
62938
94407
125876
157345
188814
0
31469
62938
94407
125876
157345
188814
RX 7900 XT
188809
RX 9070 XT
181320
RX 7900 GRE
176152
RX 7800 XT
156865
RX 7700 XT
141288
RX 9060 XT
124251
RX 7600 XT
99223

The system used for testing doesn't seem to be a bottleneck, as it uses an AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D CPU with 32 GB of DDR5-8000 memory, while the GPU posted a maximum frequency of 2787 MHz, which is lower than the 3 GHz+ boost frequency that the chip is meant to operate at. With that said, we expect the Radeon RX 9060 XT to be at least as fast as the 7700 XT if not faster in gaming work-loads, so better to wait for official benchmarks early next month.

Officially, AMD has touted the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB GPU to be an RTX 5060 Ti competitor while offering a lower price point than even the competitor's 8 GB variant.

AMD Radeon RX 9000 "RDNA 4" GPU Specs:

GPURadeon RX 9070 XTRadeon RX 9070Radeon RX 9070 GRE 16 GBRadeon RX 9070 GRE 12 GBRadeon RX 9060 XTRadeon RX 9060Radeon RX 9050?
ArchitectureRDNA 4RDNA 4RDNA 4RDNA 4RDNA 4RDNA 4RDNA 4
GPU SKUNavi 48Navi 48Navi 48Navi 48Navi 44Navi 44Navi 44
Process NodeTSMC 4nmTSMC 4nmTSMC 4nmTSMC 4nmTSMC 4nmTSMC 4nmTSMC 4nm
Transistor Count53.9 Billion53.9 Billion53.9 Billion53.9 Billion29.7 Billion29.7 Billion29.7 Billion
Die Size357mm2357mm2357mm2357mm2199mm2199mm2TBD
Compute Units6456TBD483228TBD
Ray Accelerators6456TBD483228TBD
AI Accelerators128112TBD966456TBD
Stream Processors40963584TBD307220481792TBD
Game Clock2400 MHz2070 MHzTBD2220 MHz2530 MHzTBDTBD
Boost Clock2970 MHz2540 MHzTBD2790 MHz3130 MHz2990 MHzTBD
Peak FP3248.7 TFLOPs36.1 TFLOPsTBD34.3 TFLOPs25.6 TFLOPs21.4 TFLOPSTBD
Peak FP1697.3 TFLOPs72.3 TFLOPsTBD68.6 TFLOPs51.3 TFLOPs42.9 TFLOPSTBD
Peak INT8779 TOPS (Sparsity)578 TOPS (Sparsity)TBD549 TOPS (Sparsity)410 TOPS (Sparsity)343 TOPSTBD
Peak INT41557 TOPS (Sparsity)1156 TOPS (Sparsity)TBD1097 TOPS (Sparsity)821 TOPS (Sparsity)686 TOPSTBD
ROPS128128TBD966464TBD
Infinity Cache64 MB64 MB64 MB?48 MB32 MB32 MBTBD
Memory16 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR616 GB GDDR612 GB GDDR68/16 GB GDDR68 GB GDDR6TBD
Memory Speed20 Gbps20 Gbps18 Gbps?18 Gbps20 Gbps18 GbpsTBD
Bus Interface256-bit256-bit256-bit192-bit128-bit128-bitTBD
PCIe InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16TBD
TBP304W220WTBD220W150-182WTBDTBD
Price$599 US$549 USTBD4199 RMB$299/$349 USTBDTBD
Launch6th March, 20256th March, 2025Sep-Oct 20258th May, 20252025TBDTBD

News Sources: Benchleaks #1 , #2

About the author: A Software Engineer by training and a PC enthusiast by passion, Hassan Mujtaba serves as Wccftech's Senior Editor for hardware section. With years of experience in the industry, he specializes in deep-dive technical analysis of next-generation CPU and GPU architectures, motherboards, and cooling solutions. His work involves not only breaking news on upcoming technologies but also extensive hands-on reviews and benchmarking.

Follow Wccftech on Google to get more of our news coverage in your feeds.