AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT "RDNA 4" GPU benchmarks have appeared for the first time in the Geekbench database, and show slower performance than the RX 7700 XT, an RDNA 3-based graphics card.
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT GPU With 16 GB VRAM Tested In Geekbench Benchmarks, RDNA 4 Vs RDNA 3
The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT is going to be the mainstream gaming offering within the RDNA 4 lineup. The graphics card will come in two flavors: a 16 GB model, which will be priced at $349 US, and an 8 GB model, which is going to be priced at $299 US. The 16 GB model has now been tested within the Geekbench benchmark, but before getting into the numbers, let's talk a bit about the specifications the card has on offer.
With the Radeon RX 9060 XT, AMD is leveraging the TSMC 4nm process technology and dialing up the clock speeds to 11. The chip features a boost clock of up to 3.13 GHz, making it the first GPU to have such a high frequency out of the box. We can expect custom models to operate around 3.2-3.3 GHz. The GPU also features a TBP of 150 to 182W, which is respective to the VRAM featured on each SKU.
That's also why we have to talk about the memory solution used by the RX 9060 XT. The graphics card will come in both 8 GB and 16 GB variants. The card will feature a 128-bit bus interface and a 20 Gbps GDDR6 memory solution. The card feels very similar to the RTX 5060 Ti regarding its memory configuration, but the competition is leveraging faster GDDR7 memory. It was rumored that AMD might cancel the 8 GB variant in response to the poor reception of NVIDIA's 8 GB 5060 Ti and 5060, but that doesn't seem to be the case.
Starting with the OpenCL benchmark score, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB graphics card scored 109315 points, which is 31% faster than the RX 7600 XT 16 GB but 14% slower than the RX 7700 XT.
Geekbench OpenCL GPU Benchmark (Higher is Better)
We see the same scenario in the Vulkan tests, where the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT sits at 25% faster than the Radeon RX 7600 XT 16 GB graphics card, but ends up 12% slower than the RX 7700 XT, and that's a very similarly priced solution in the current market.
Geekbench Vulkan GPU Benchmark (Higher is Better)
The system used for testing doesn't seem to be a bottleneck, as it uses an AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D CPU with 32 GB of DDR5-8000 memory, while the GPU posted a maximum frequency of 2787 MHz, which is lower than the 3 GHz+ boost frequency that the chip is meant to operate at. With that said, we expect the Radeon RX 9060 XT to be at least as fast as the 7700 XT if not faster in gaming work-loads, so better to wait for official benchmarks early next month.
Officially, AMD has touted the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB GPU to be an RTX 5060 Ti competitor while offering a lower price point than even the competitor's 8 GB variant.
AMD Radeon RX 9000 "RDNA 4" GPU Specs:
| GPU | Radeon RX 9070 XT | Radeon RX 9070 | Radeon RX 9070 GRE 16 GB | Radeon RX 9070 GRE 12 GB | Radeon RX 9060 XT | Radeon RX 9060 | Radeon RX 9050? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | RDNA 4 | RDNA 4 | RDNA 4 | RDNA 4 | RDNA 4 | RDNA 4 | RDNA 4 |
| GPU SKU | Navi 48 | Navi 48 | Navi 48 | Navi 48 | Navi 44 | Navi 44 | Navi 44 |
| Process Node | TSMC 4nm | TSMC 4nm | TSMC 4nm | TSMC 4nm | TSMC 4nm | TSMC 4nm | TSMC 4nm |
| Transistor Count | 53.9 Billion | 53.9 Billion | 53.9 Billion | 53.9 Billion | 29.7 Billion | 29.7 Billion | 29.7 Billion |
| Die Size | 357mm2 | 357mm2 | 357mm2 | 357mm2 | 199mm2 | 199mm2 | TBD |
| Compute Units | 64 | 56 | TBD | 48 | 32 | 28 | TBD |
| Ray Accelerators | 64 | 56 | TBD | 48 | 32 | 28 | TBD |
| AI Accelerators | 128 | 112 | TBD | 96 | 64 | 56 | TBD |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | 3584 | TBD | 3072 | 2048 | 1792 | TBD |
| Game Clock | 2400 MHz | 2070 MHz | TBD | 2220 MHz | 2530 MHz | TBD | TBD |
| Boost Clock | 2970 MHz | 2540 MHz | TBD | 2790 MHz | 3130 MHz | 2990 MHz | TBD |
| Peak FP32 | 48.7 TFLOPs | 36.1 TFLOPs | TBD | 34.3 TFLOPs | 25.6 TFLOPs | 21.4 TFLOPS | TBD |
| Peak FP16 | 97.3 TFLOPs | 72.3 TFLOPs | TBD | 68.6 TFLOPs | 51.3 TFLOPs | 42.9 TFLOPS | TBD |
| Peak INT8 | 779 TOPS (Sparsity) | 578 TOPS (Sparsity) | TBD | 549 TOPS (Sparsity) | 410 TOPS (Sparsity) | 343 TOPS | TBD |
| Peak INT4 | 1557 TOPS (Sparsity) | 1156 TOPS (Sparsity) | TBD | 1097 TOPS (Sparsity) | 821 TOPS (Sparsity) | 686 TOPS | TBD |
| ROPS | 128 | 128 | TBD | 96 | 64 | 64 | TBD |
| Infinity Cache | 64 MB | 64 MB | 64 MB? | 48 MB | 32 MB | 32 MB | TBD |
| Memory | 16 GB GDDR6 | 16 GB GDDR6 | 16 GB GDDR6 | 12 GB GDDR6 | 8/16 GB GDDR6 | 8 GB GDDR6 | TBD |
| Memory Speed | 20 Gbps | 20 Gbps | 18 Gbps? | 18 Gbps | 20 Gbps | 18 Gbps | TBD |
| Bus Interface | 256-bit | 256-bit | 256-bit | 192-bit | 128-bit | 128-bit | TBD |
| PCIe Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 | TBD |
| TBP | 304W | 220W | TBD | 220W | 150-182W | TBD | TBD |
| Price | $599 US | $549 US | TBD | 4199 RMB | $299/$349 US | TBD | TBD |
| Launch | 6th March, 2025 | 6th March, 2025 | Sep-Oct 2025 | 8th May, 2025 | 2025 | TBD | TBD |
News Sources: Benchleaks #1 , #2
Follow Wccftech on Google to get more of our news coverage in your feeds.