U.S. Court Allows Police Warrantless Access to Phone Location Data

Author Photo
Jun 1, 2016
28Shares
Submit

An appeals court has ruled that law enforcement does not need a warrant to access a suspect’s location data based on cell-site information.

Police to have warrantless access to phone location data

In a 12-3 vote, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the police doesn’t need to seek a warrant in order to obtain phone location data. Amid the discussion between security and privacy, the U.S. courts are apparently finding it hard to find a balance between the two equally important sides of technology. While latest technology can help the law enforcement get to a suspect more easily, it doesn’t necessarily mean that the police should have access to data that a user considers private. As the lines between privacy, surveillance and security get even more blur, we are looking at courts being inconsistent about their decisions.

Related Trump’s iPhone Has Only One App Installed and We Wish It Wasn’t Twitter

In a latest such move, the Fourth Circuit appeals court has overturned a decision taken last year, arguing that the government can get the location information from a third-party. The court says that this doesn’t violate a person’s Fourth Amendment right to protection against unwarranted searches and seizures, since the location data is voluntarily provided to a third party – carriers. In this week’s ruling, Judge Diana Motz said obtaining cell-site location data doesn’t violate the 4th Amendment because the data was already being shared with a person’s cell service provider.

“Anyone who has stepped outside to ‘get a signal,’ or has warned a caller of a potential loss of service before entering an elevator, understands, on some level, that location matters,” Motz wrote. “Whenever he expects his phone to work, he is permitting – indeed, requesting – his service provider to establish a connection between his phone and a nearby cell tower,” she further said.

Related Beware! Hackers Are Exploiting Subtitle Files to Infect Your Computer With Malware

This decision is a bad news for privacy advocates, who have long argued that the use of phone signals is a requirement for the phone to function, not a choice, and thus should be exempt from the third-party doctrine that affects more traditional records. The Supreme Court is yet to rule on the issue.

– Windows Zero-Day Flaw Goes on Sale for $90,000 – Works on ALL Windows Versions

Submit