NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Benchmarks Unveiled – Might Be Faster Than The Radeon R9 370X

Hassan Mujtaba
Posted 1 year ago

The first benchmarks of the GeForce GTX 950 graphics card from NVIDIA have leaked out over at Videocardz. The GeForce GTX 950 is the latest Maxwell based graphics card  that is allegedly going to hit the streets on 20th August with a pricing of $149 US. While the launch sounds great, NVIDIA should gear up for a tough round as the Radeon R9 370X is also planned for launch (or is silently launched) in the market with a price of $179 US and will compete against the GeForce GTX 950.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 “Maxwell GM206-250-A1” Graphics Card Benchmarked

Now I have been explaining since a few days how the Radeon R9 370X and Radeon R7 370 pose trouble for the current market position of NVIDIA. The Radeon R7 370 retails for $149 US and the upcoming Radeon R9 370X will retail for $179 US since that’s the next price segment AMD wants to cover after the $199 US R9 380. The entry of new sub-$200 cards is great to get hands on the budget tier market which hasn’t been updated since the last Radeon 200 series parts by AMD. NVIDIA on the other hand, also hasn’t introduced any new graphics card in this market since the last years, GM107 based, GTX 750 and GTX 750 Ti. While AMD’s cards are nothing more than refresh that reuse the same Pitcairn core architecture that is now renamed to Trinidad, they do get competitive pricing which raises the value of these aging cores that support DirectX 12 API.

The GeForce GTX 750 Ti and GeForce GTX 750 have done their part in the market and truthfully speaking, they aren’t a match to the faster Trinidad based cards. The GeForce GTX 960 currently stands against the Tonga Pro powered Radeon R9 380 with both cards fighting it out at $199 US but NVIDIA is now ready to take the fight in the sub-$200 range with their GeForce GTX 950 graphics cards. While priced similar to the Radeon R7 370, the GTX 950 will end up faster than the Radeon R7 370 and on par with the Radeon R9 370X that will retail at $179 US and more for custom variants. Now I would like to talk more about performance numbers but let’s read the specifications first and then get back to it.

The Official WCCF Hardware Polls 2016

The GeForce GTX 950 is going to feature the GM206 GPU (GM206-250-A1) that features six SMM units that house 768 CUDA Cores, 48 texture mapping units and will retain the 32 ROPs. The reference model will presumably come with clocks of 1089 MHz base and up to 1266 MHz boost clock speeds while the benched Gainward model boosted up to 1430 MHz which is quite impressive. On the memory side, the card will feature 2 GB of GDDR5 VRAM that operates along a 128-bit bus, running at 6.6 GHz and a maximum bandwidth output of 106.7 GB/s. The card is going to feature a 90W TDP which will be 10W lower than AMD’s entry level card (R7 360) but overall, the GTX 950 will be the faster out of the two. Based on the same GM206, the GeForce GTX 950 will showcase a 30W drop in TDP numbers compared to the 120W, GeForce GTX 960. Display ports on the card will include Dual-Link DVI-D/DVI-I, HDMI 2.0 and a Display Port 1.2 connector on the reference variants.


Tested with 3DMark 11 Performance Mode

Back to the performance details, the card managed to score X2939 points in 3DMark 11 (Extreme) and 3007 points in 3DMark Firestrike (Extreme). Now if we compare these numbers to the Powercolor Devil Radeon R9 370X which is a custom model clocked at 1180 MHz and priced more than $179 US, we see that the AMD chip scores X2761 points in 3DMark 11 (Extreme) and 3035 points in 3DMark Firestrike (Extreme). While the second score is indeed higher than the GTX 950, it should be pointed that the AMD model was tested with a Core i7-4790K processor while the NVIDIA model was tested with a Core i5-2500 chip. So if you look more closely at the benchmarks, the GTX 950 actually has a lead in the graphics performance test whereas the Physics tests add to the total score of the AMD graphics card’s benchmark. Now we have both custom models, the GTX 950 with a reference price of $149 US and custom model retailing at $169-$179 US while the Radeon R9 370X having a reference price of $179 US and custom model with a price of $189-$199 US. The GeForce GTX 950 definitely has better price to performance ratio than the R7 370 at stock and overclocked models mean that even the Radeon R9 370X will see a hard time. The other advantages fall in the form of Maxwell enhancements with regards to the new architecture that are something not found on R7 370 or R9 370X due to their relatively old GPU architecture.

NVIDIA Unveils Tegra Parker SOC at Hot Chips - Built on 16nm TSMC Process, Features Pascal and Denver 2 Duo Architecture

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 3DMark Scores:

AMD Radeon R9 370X 3DMark Scores:

We first saw the Radeon R9 370X around a month ago and the latest (unofficial) review was published two weeks ago. The card is already up for sale on Chinese retail sites making it a silent launch and AMD has no words by themselves on the availability of the new graphics card. The GeForce GTX 950 on the other hand is allegedly going to launch tomorrow and we will see whether it lives up to be a great budget entry or not.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Custom Models (Courtesy of Videocardz):

NVIDIA GeForce 900 Series Graphics Cards:

Graphics CardGPU CoreCore/TMU/ROP ConfigurationCore / Boost ClockTDP / Power ConnectorsVRAM / Memory BusMemory BandwidthPrice
NVIDIA GeForce GTX Titan XGM2003072/192/961000/1089 MHz250W (8+6 Pin)12 GB / 384-bit336.6 GB/s$999
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 TiGM2002816/176/961000/1076 MHz250W (8+6 Pin)6 GB / 384-bit336.6 GB/s$649
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980GM2042048/128/641127/1216 MHz165W (6+6 Pin)4 GB / 256-bit224.0 GB/s$499
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970GM2041664/104/561051/1178 MHz149W (6+6 Pin)4 GB / 256-bit
224.0 GB/s
(192.0 GB/s With Cross Bar GM204)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960GM2061024/64/321127/1178 MHz120W (6+6 Pin)2 GB / 128-bit112.2 GB/s$199
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950GM206-250 A1768/48/321024/1188 MHz90W (6-Pin)2 GB / 128-bit105.6 GB/s$149
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 SEGM206-251 A1768/48/32TBC75W (6-Pin)2 GB / 128-bitTBC~$129

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Reddit